[interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 02:28:39 +0100
On 2003-11-08 at 00:33:40 [+0100], you wrote:
> Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I shouldn't muse about such things after a couple glasses of wine.
> > This part
> > is of course complete nonsense. As the name suggests, the shared
> > object's
> > code may be shared by other processes. Manipulating it this way would
> > badly
> > crash them.
>
> Hehe, seems like you have a drinking problem ;-))
Nah, I only have a problem when there is nothing to drink. ;-)
> But in general it's a nice hack :)
Thanks.
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Axel Dörfler