[interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 00:33:40 +0100 CET
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I shouldn't muse about such things after a couple glasses of wine.
> This part
> is of course complete nonsense. As the name suggests, the shared
> object's
> code may be shared by other processes. Manipulating it this way would
> badly
> crash them.
Hehe, seems like you have a drinking problem ;-))
But in general it's a nice hack :)
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Ingo Weinhold