[interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 03:44:55 +0100 CET
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2003-11-06 at 11:09:30 [+0100], Oliver Tappe wrote:
> > I have finally found the time to finish the patch (which is rather
> > large,
> > I'm afraid...).
> > ...
> > - Several tests have been added.
> Very nice!
Indeed, and thanks a lot!
> > CPPUNIT_ASSERT_DEBUGGER( s.Insert( "dummy", 20));
> > Does this kind of stuff already exist in cppunit? Is it feasible at
> > all?
> AFAIK, it is not implemented and at the time I hit this problem
> myself (a
> year or so ago) I thought it wasn't possible to solve... Now I know
> better.
> :-)
> ...
> If noone objects, I can try and extend our unit test framework to
> support
> testing for debugger calls.
That would be great! How does it work, btw? :-)
> > In general, it seems obvious that BString needs some more work at a
> > later
> > stage. IMHO the idea of accepting negative offsets/values does make
> > sense
> > and there is a need for throwing exceptions (at least bad_alloc)
> > but I
> > believe this is all work that should go into R2.
> Yep, let's postpone this. There are more important things to be done
> at the
> moment, like getting a working system in the first place. :-)
Wouldn't be that bad, right.
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Ingo Weinhold