[interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 17:29:59 +0100 CET
"Massimiliano Origgi" <origgi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The most obvious solution would be a port of gdb with a nice user
> interface around it(it would also make the future move to gcc 3
> painless). Do you know of any serious issue which would make gdb
> unusable under BeOS/OpenBeOS/Whatever?
Only that it used to not like multi-threaded debugging. But I haven't
used it for a while.
But I think we should have a closer look at gdb before doing the
debugger API.
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Massimiliano Origgi
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- » [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- [interfacekit] Re: A patch for BString
- From: Massimiliano Origgi