[interfacekit] Re: __mime_table

> >Very good point. Perhaps it is sufficient to not just to look, if 
> > there
> >are spare CPU cycles at all, but, in case there are no spare cycle, 
> > to
> >analyze what priority the processes have that consume most of the 
> cycles.
> >Supposing that SETI and similar background number crunching 
> > processes 
> have
> >the lowest imaginable priority, this seems to be a reasonable 
> > strategy.
> 
> Another possibility, which might be a bit too hackish, would be to 
> set 
> up a BMessageRunner so that our sniffing happens on a reasonably 
> regular 
> schedule regardless of what else is going on.

Mmh, wasn't it a bit annoying, if you're watching a movie and suddenly 
it starts dropping frames because the registrar thinks that the time 
was ripe for updating the MIME database?

CU, Ingo

Other related posts: