[Ilugc] got a shell, now ...
- From: sridharinfinity@xxxxxxxxx (Sridhar R)
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:18:22 -0800 (PST)
--- Suresh Ramasubramanian <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
-- snip --- about nohup
[contd]
Is there any way to `nohup` a _running_ process?
but be CAREFUL. especially when leaving an irc bot
running like that.
What are the dangers do you think that might happen?
=====
Windows 2000 is more secure than Linux...
Since the machine is offline half of the time because of crashes, it cannot be
accessed globally, therefore producing higher security.
---
Sridhar R
Email: r_sridhar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW:
http://sridhar.has.it
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
Other related posts:
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Sridhar R
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Suresh Ramasubramanian
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Suraj
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Sridhar R
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Sridhar R
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ... - Sridhar R
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Suraj
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Sridhar R
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Suraj
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Suraj
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Suresh Ramasubramanian
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Sridhar R
- » [Ilugc] got a shell, now ...- Suresh Ramasubramanian