Gimp2, reviewed favourably at SitePoint.
http://www.sitepoint.com/newsletter/viewissue.php?id=3&issue=86#8
Rajendran.
From Suresh Titus John" <sureshtytus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thu Apr 1 07:55:04 2004
From: Suresh Titus John" <sureshtytus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Suresh Titus John)
Date: 1 Apr 2004 07:55:04 -0000
Subject: [Ilugc] GNU doubt
Message-ID: <20040401075504.24177.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This is a multipart mime message
--Next_1080806104---0-203.199.83.28-24172
Content-type: text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
<P>=0A<BR>=0AOn Thu, 01 Apr 2004 rajendran wrote :<BR>=0A>So, if I write=
software SO GOOD that it doesn't need support at all,<BR>=0A>OR<BR>=0A&=
gt;if I write software, get done with it, and move on onto a different prod=
uct,<BR>=0A>closing the previous one down, or onto a different field its=
elf like<BR>=0A>beekeeping or horticulture,<BR>=0A><BR>=0A>this fu=
nda doesn't work at all, then.<BR>=0A><BR>=0A>Right?<BR>=0A><BR>=
=0A>Rajendran.<BR>=0A><BR>=0A<BR>=0AThis GPL license is there precise=
ly to protect this kind of action. You make a software and sell it to a cus=
tomer at a big price. Later when the customer faces problems and approaches=
you - and you say you just dumped the project and wont support it anymore.=
<BR>=0AGPL is there to see that the customer isnt at the mercy of software=
creator.<BR>=0A<BR>=0A<BR>=0AThe other thing is that there is no "sof=
tware SO GOOD that it doesn't need support at all". <BR>=0A<BR>=0Ahttp=
://fishbowl.pastiche.org/2004/02/21/how_to_write_perfect_software<BR>=0A<BR=
=0Ahttp://c2.com/cgi/wiki?ThereIsNoSuchThingAsNoBugs<BR>=0A<BR>=0A<BR>=0AT=itus :>=0A</P>=0A<br><br>=0A<A target=3D"_blank" HREF=3D"http://clients.=