[PCB_FORUM] Re: two shapes on shape-based pad.
- From: Mark Salberg <msalberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:41:27 -0400
Wo...stop the presses Barbara,
Just got if fixed!
Our librarian just found that since it is a "shape-based pad" it does
not get refreshed until you refresh symbols THEN *PLACE -> Update
Symbols -> Shape and flash symbols -> then select rl279a2 and rl279a2sm.
*
And it WORKED!
Sorry for wasting any of your time, but this was just discovered after I
sent the board to you.
Also, thanks for the other feedback from the group.
Thanks again!
Mark
*
*
Barbara Seeger wrote:
Mark,
I think I can explain the problem. There is an arc that is very small
in that pad shape. It has been rounded down by the Gerber viewer, which
moved the end points to points that forced the arc to draw in the
opposite direction. This ends up looking like a void in the shape.
You should look at the brd accuracy, and the artwork decimal accuracy
written. We had in the past done that same rounding down in the artwork
we wrote when the inch decimal output was less than the brd accuracy.
That was fixed so that we flatten those small arcs to prevent such
issues if customers have CAM systems that are not able to read high
accuracy artwork files. That's what makes me suspect it's the GCPREVUE.
You end up with 2 choices. You can edit the shape data in Allegro, and
remove the arc yourself or you can see if the CAM station can be set up
to read at a matching accuracy.
If I've confused you or you want Cadence o help directly, please
contact me directly. I'd be happy to take a look after you review
the output logs and check the CAM tool to see if this is pointing to it.
Regards,
Barbara Seeger 978-262-6578 Cadence Design Systems
From: Mark Salberg <msalberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Anybody know what can cause this?
Our librarian can not see the circular shape which shows up as a void on
the pad.
DBcheck shows the attached error and does not show up in lib editor.
It can also be seen in gerber format on GCPREVUE.
Thanks,
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For
more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe/unsubscribe:
Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe
To view the archives of this list go to
http://www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/
Problems or Questions:
Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For
more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For
more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________
- Follow-Ups:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: two shapes on shape-based pad.
- From: Reade, Sue
- References:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: two shapes on shape-based pad.
- From: Barbara Seeger
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] two shapes on shape-based pad.
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: two shapes on shape-based pad.
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: two shapes on shape-based pad.
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: two shapes on shape-based pad.
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: two shapes on shape-based pad.
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: two shapes on shape-based pad.
Mark, I think I can explain the problem. There is an arc that is very small in that pad shape. It has been rounded down by the Gerber viewer, whichmoved the end points to points that forced the arc to draw in the opposite direction. This ends up looking like a void in the shape. You should look at the brd accuracy, and the artwork decimal accuracy
written. We had in the past done that same rounding down in the artwork we wrote when the inch decimal output was less than the brd accuracy. That was fixed so that we flatten those small arcs to prevent such issues if customers have CAM systems that are not able to read high accuracy artwork files. That's what makes me suspect it's the GCPREVUE.You end up with 2 choices. You can edit the shape data in Allegro, and remove the arc yourself or you can see if the CAM station can be set up
to read at a matching accuracy.If I've confused you or you want Cadence o help directly, please contact me directly. I'd be happy to take a look after you review the output logs and check the CAM tool to see if this is pointing to it. Regards,
Barbara Seeger 978-262-6578 Cadence Design Systems
From: Mark Salberg <msalberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Anybody know what can cause this?Our librarian can not see the circular shape which shows up as a void on the pad.DBcheck shows the attached error and does not show up in lib editor. It can also be seen in gerber format on GCPREVUE. Thanks, Mark _____________________________________________________________________________Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For
more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------To subscribe/unsubscribe: Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe To view the archives of this list go to http://www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/ Problems or Questions: Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ----------------------------------------------------------- _____________________________________________________________________________ Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com _____________________________________________________________________________
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: two shapes on shape-based pad.
- From: Reade, Sue
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: two shapes on shape-based pad.
- From: Barbara Seeger