[PCB_FORUM] Re: same symbol - different number of pins
- From: "Bolman, Shirley H" <shirley.h.bolman@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:57:17 -0700
We handle this problem in the following manner.
For part 1 we add the pack_type at the end of the primitive line like this:
primitive 'LM1117', 'LM1117_DTX'
This will give the pin mapping for one of the physicals.
Create a second primitive
primitive 'LM1117_MTX' (note that the 'LM1117' is not repeated on the second
primitive. That confuses Concept)
This will give the pin mapping for the second footprint.
In the part.ptf file you will need the Key Property Pack_type at the beginning
of the table
:Pack_type
'DTX' (the rest of the entry for all part entries using the same pinout)
'MTX' (the rest of the entry for all part entries using the same pinout)
This process will allow any number of different footprints to be used for the
same logic symbol as long
as the pin count is close to being the same. You would need two different logic
symbols if you have
4 pins on one logic body and 3 on the other.
I would not recommend trying to create a 4 pin part, a 8 pin part, a 16 pin
part as the same logic name.
Shirley in Oregon
It is a PRIVILEGE to be born free.
It is a RIGHT to live free.
It is a DUTY to die free.
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ed Caldwell
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 7:40 AM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: same symbol - different number of pins
William,
You did not ask... it is only a suggestion (to Cadence) to enhance Allegro.
As far as I know, Allegro does not allow more than one pin number per pin in a
footprint.
The suggested solution is based on my experience with other tools... If two pin
three's are possible in the footprint (as is with some tools), both common
footprint pin 3's connect with the single pin 3 in the schematic symbol and in
your situation, allows you to use the same schematic symbol for the two
different footprints.
Hope this helps... I am afraid I am only added confusion... If so, Please
accept my apology.
Ed
"William Billereau" <William.Billereau@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
10/11/2006 10:06 AM
Please respond to
icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[PCB_FORUM] Re: same symbol - different number of pins
Dear Ed,
If Cadence was able to numbering 1,2,3 for a 3 pins and 1,2,3,4 (and not
1,2,3,3) for a 4 pins device, it will be fine.
We already have devices with different number of pins... either in NC_PINS
section or POWER_PINS...
So I was just asking for something I was thinking it can be possible.
My english is probably not good enough to understand what you meant with this
kind of comments....
could you explain?
where did I ask for 1,2,3,3??
William.
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ed Caldwell
Sent: 11 October, 2006 3:08 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: same symbol - different number of pins
Sorry to have submitted what you already knew. Sounds like you have your hands
full trying to keep up with the EE's!
If Cadence was able to allow numbering multiple pins the same (i.e. 1,2,3,3)
your quest would be simpler. Perhaps a future enhancement???
Ed
"William Billereau" <William.Billereau@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
10/11/2006 08:15 AM
Please respond to
icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[PCB_FORUM] Re: same symbol - different number of pins
thanks, but I was just wondering how to avoid this.
Just to warn schematic designers that by choosing LM1117 they can have
different types.
(we have a lot of them taking the first thing that "looks like" what they want.
Then we have to change later for what they purchased....)
If there is no other way I will do it as you suggest.
William.
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ed Caldwell
Sent: 11 October, 2006 1:59 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: same symbol - different number of pins
Make a different schematic symbol for each (part number) with appropriate pin
counts.
"William Billereau" <William.Billereau@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
10/11/2006 07:48 AM
Please respond to
icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[PCB_FORUM] same symbol - different number of pins
Hello All.
Is there a solution for such component in ConceptHDL:
LM1117 from National:
DTX type = TO252 3 pins
MPX type = SOT223 4 pins . the fourth is the tab that has to be connected to
OUT pin 2.
How to do it to:
-have only one symbol body
(I think without any "tab" pin. I tried with 2 versions on with the TAB the
other without. But Add Part only take version 1 by default.)
-Connect this TAB automatically to pin 2 OUT
(I tried to add in the parttable to MPX type a PACK_SHORT='(2,4)' but
unsuccessfully.)
- Select anyone of both different type in a single parttable..
Thanks in advance.
PS. This case seems to be a common problem. By searching "regulator tab" in
sourcelink, it returns a case for a MC7805CT2 (or 3).
http://sourcelink.cadence.com/docs/db/kdb/1998/July/1816165.html
<http://sourcelink.cadence.com/docs/db/kdb/1998/July/1816165.html>
but the test2_archive.zip contains only a body with the tab, but selecting a
new one shows a 3 pin JEDEC and the import logic returns a "incorrect pin
number".
So this test2 does not work.
They speak about a multipin.tar available on ftp.cadence.com
<ftp://ftp.cadence.com/> but this FTP site is unaccessible.
Does anybody get it somewhere?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Billereau William | PCB Designer |
| | Tel: (+4122) 76 73403 |
| CERN TS/DEM | william.billereau@xxxxxxx |
| 1211 Geneve 23 Switzerland | Société: AMEC-SPIE/Electrotech |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Other related posts: