[PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- From: "richard moffat" <richard.moffat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:54:32 +1200
Hi
This was one of the first things I did in Allegro - set up layer combinations
onto function keys, and later on, X-Keys. I use the 58 key version - now I
wouldn't work without it.
With X-Keys, I normally run scripts (macros and Skill) through aliases. I find
it may give a little more control.
Try Skill commands instead of script replays where you can. They will be
faster.
Examples:
Here's a template of how I named the keys:
# xk11 xk12 xk13 xk14 xk15 xk16 xk17 xk18 xk19
# xk110 xk111 xk112 xk113 xk114 xk115 xk116 xk117 xk118
# xk21 xk22 xk31 xk32 xk33 xk34 xk41 xk42
# xk23 xk24 xk35 xk36 xk37 xk38 xk43 xk44
# xk25 xk26 xk39 xk310 xk311 xk312 xk45 xk46
# xk27 xk28 xk313 xk314 xk315 xk316 xk47 xk48
# xk29 xk210 xk317 xk318 xk319 xk320 xk49 xk410
Here are a couple of lines from my env files:
alias xk14 replay 'k:'\allegro'\util'\allegro_scripts'\grid_eq_1.scr'
alias xk21 top silk
Expanding on the "Top Silk" bit...
Somewhere along the lines, 'top silk' is registered on boot (could be done in
different places):
axlCmdRegister("top silk" 'top_silk ?cmdType "general")
And what the 'top_silk.il" consists of (loaded on boot as well):
procedure( top_silk()
axlVisibleDesign(nil)
axlVisibleLayer("ref des/silkscreen_top" t)
axlVisibleLayer("package geometry/silkscreen_top" t)
axlVisibleLayer("board geometry/silk_box_top" t)
axlVisibleLayer("board geometry/brd_id_silk_top" t)
axlVisibleLayer("via class/soldermask_top" t)
axlVisibleLayer("via class/soldermask_bottom" t)
axlVisibleLayer("pin/soldermask_top" t)
axlVisibleLayer("board geometry/outline" t)
axlVisibleLayer("board geometry/silkscreen_top" t)
axlVisibleLayer("board geometry/soldermask_top" t)
axlVisibleLayer("package geometry/soldermask_top" t)
axlVisibleLayer("route keepin/all" t)
axlVisibleLayer("DRC ERROR CLASS/PACKAGE_TOP" t)
axlVisibleUpdate(t)
)
Just some more ideas - there's no right or wrong way to set them up. Hope it
helps.
Cheers,
Richard
__________________________
Richard Moffat
PCB CAD Manager
Allied Telesis Labs
ph. +64 (3) 3393000
richard.moffat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> gary.macindoe@xxxxxxx 25/04/2006 8:06 a.m. >>>
Thanks for the response David. I was mainly wondering if it is worth getting
(easy to set up, reliable etc.). One of the scripts I use is "t.scr" which
turns on only top pads, etch assemblies etc. I have "replay t" aliased to "t",
so when I type "t", Enter it runs the "t" script. So, can the X-Key keyboard
be set up to perform both "t" and the Enter? That would be great to hit one
key and have the script run! Hmmm, maybe I should think about the 58 key
instead of the 20 key. Sure, I'm always open to ideas for scripts. I have lots
of them to set up the initial database depending on a standard format (i.e.
pci, lpc, atx, mini itx etc.) and layer count (4, 6, 8, 10). I also have
several to change views, grids etc. I just had to bang on all of the set up
scripts for them to manual place format symbols since we went to 15.5. Regards,
Gary E. MacIndoePCB Design EngineerAdvanced Micro DevicesLongmont, Colorado
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Greig
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 1:24 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
Using the ~56 key one. Got some scripts if you want ideas on setting it up.
Also use another for C programming and spice - fewer syntax errors that way.
Best Regards David Greig______________________________GigaDyne LtdBuchan
HouseCarnegie CampusDunfermline KY11 8PLUnited Kingdomt: +44 (0)1383 624
975www.gigadyne.co.uk______________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gary MacIndoe
Sent: 24 April 2006 20:08
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] X-Keys 20 key, any good?Hey again, So here's another one.
Anybody use the Pi Engineering X-Keys 20 key programmable supplemental
keyboard? Is it easy to program, works well?Thanks for any input. Gary E.
MacIndoePCB Design EngineerAdvanced Micro DevicesLongmont, Colorado -- Virus
scanned by Lumison.
NOTICE: This message contains privileged and confidential
information intended only for the use of the addressee
named above. If you are not the intended recipient of
this message you are hereby notified that you must not
disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.
If you have received this message in error please
notify Allied Telesis Labs Ltd immediately.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender has the
authority to issue and specifically states them to
be the views of Allied Telesis Labs.
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: X-Keys 20 key, any good?