[PCB_FORUM] Re: Schematic drafting practices
- From: "Austin Franklin" <allegrolist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:28:03 -0500
Hi Bill,
That absolutely not true. For a wireless installation I recently designed,
we had to go in the field to debug some issues with a particular
installation. These issues could not be debugged in the lab. These issues
were absolutely field debuggable. And yes, we have 1100+ processors and
FPGA on them, and yes they have an RTOS that we ARE able to bring up and use
a debugger on, download special code to etc.
This has nothing to do with "applying old rules to new designs". It has to
do with having the accurate and complete documentation with which to work
from. Period.
The real important question I've asked you is how do you verify pins on a
schematic are hooked up correctly if the pins are not visible? Especially
if you do are not using the native tool to do the verification. Please
answer that.
Regards,
Austin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bill Dempsey
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:19 PM
> To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Schematic drafting practices
>
>
> I guess one thing may not be clear to you guys arguing for p/g
> pins visible
> everywhere.
> These designs.. are no long field debuggable. We're talking 1100+ pin
> multi-processor/FPGA designs that a field guy can't debug. RTOS effects
> that can't be field investigated, etc...
> The simple circuits on those boards? That are debuggable? Yes,
> the pins are
> shown.
>
> Moral: don't apply old rules to new designs.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Austin Franklin
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:30 PM
> To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Schematic drafting practices
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Exactly! I've also been in field service, and yes, that information is
> critical, whether in a printed manual, or in PDF. It also points out uses
> for the schematics other than simply generating a netlist. And that this
> use may not entail the native tool used to draw the schematics.
> Making the
> schematics more useful for all the intended (and sometimes unintended)
> purposes is very important, IMO.
>
> Regards,
>
> Austin
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Ritter, Alan
> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:17 AM
> > To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Schematic drafting practices
> >
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, what about field service guys who may not
> > have ready access to online (on-disc) .pdf files? Having all
> > information available in the schematic as either a table or
> > explicit pinouts seems critical for field service activities.
> >
> > (Grated, my viewpoint is from that of a medical capital equipment
> > manufacturer with a field service force, not a manufacturer of
> > consumer goods that are throwaways and never "fixed" in the
> normal sense.)
> >
> > /s/jar (Alan Ritter, alan.ritter@xxxxxxxxxx)
> > http://www.mtritter.org
> >
> >
> > Just a few comments from my side of the world. I have to use my own
> > schematics in the lab as I am the EE who is forced to use his own work
> > (schematics, layouts, silkscreen!!, documentation). I *never* use the
> > power/ground table nor do I use the individual pinned out symbols
> > -- in the
> > case where the symbol is huge (FPGA, processor). I use PDF! I hotlink
> > everything in the lab to PDF now and have monitors around where
> > online data
> > (local, www) is at your fingertips. When using OrCAD, the P/G for large
> > symbols is placed as its own part with individual pins. In Concept, the
> > hidden P/G through size is used with and without the table.
> Tables are no
> > longer generated as we find they are a waste of time. For small analog
> > parts, the VCC/GND pins are individually instantiated.
> >
> > Over the last 25 yrs I have seen schematics change from draftsman-drawn
> > blueprints to modern CAD schematics. I know what *hands-on* guys
> > are using
> > in the lab. I've managed labs. I've debugged. I've layed out.
> > I've built
> > symbols. Power and Ground needs to be your company philosophy --
> > but don't
> > force something on someone until YOU'VE used your own
> documentation RULES
> > and learned the pros and cons of the rules.
> >
> > BD
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > EMAIL DISCLAIMER
> >
> > Please Note: The information contained in this message may be
> > privileged and
> > confidential, protected from disclosure, and/or intended only for
> > the use of
> > the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this
> message is not
> > the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
> delivering
> > this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> > disclosure, distribution, copying or other dissemination of this
> > communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this
> > communication in
> > error, please immediately reply to the sender, delete the message and
> > destroy all copies of it.
> >
> > Thank You
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe
> >
> > To view the archives of this list go to
> > http://www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/
> >
> > Problems or Questions:
> > Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe/unsubscribe:
> Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe
>
> To view the archives of this list go to
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/
>
> Problems or Questions:
> Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe/unsubscribe:
> Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe
>
> To view the archives of this list go to
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/
>
> Problems or Questions:
> Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe/unsubscribe:
Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe
To view the archives of this list go to
http://www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/
Problems or Questions:
Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts: