[PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- From: "Cosentino, Tony" <Tony.Cosentino@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:58:00 -0500
Michael,
Thanks. That pesky "0" is what was causing my problems. Interesting that
"null" and "0" is treated so differently in this case.
Tony
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael
Catrambone
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 4:31 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to
Allegro
Hi Tony,
The DIFFP_PHASE_TOL value is treated as an absolute number so 25 mils
indicates that one net in the pair cannot be longer than 25 mils to the
other.
With RELATIVE_PROPAGATION_DELAY by leaving the Delta field blank will
give 25 mils absolute match and if the Delta field contains any other
number it will be treated as a +/- Tolerance. (Delta field is after the
S: in the example below)
RELATIVE_PROPAGATION_DELAY GRP:G:L:S::25 --> Means
the nets in the group should match to 25mils.
RELATIVE_PROPAGATION_DELAY GRP:G:L:S:0:25 --> Means
the nets in the group should match to +/-25mils which may yield up to 50
mils between nets.
I just wanted to clarify the Rel Prop Delay value settings.
Hope this helps,
Michael Catrambone
UTStarcom, Inc.
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cosentino, Tony
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 3:09 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to
Allegro
Just be careful because the 25 mil matching property may be +/-25 mils
not 25 mils absolute. I know with the REL_PROP_DELAY approach 25 mils is
really +/- which yields a total match length difference of 50 mils.
Thanks
Tony Cosentino
Tekelec
919-460-3656 office
919-414-2083 cell
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael
Catrambone
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 3:15 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to
Allegro
Importance: High
You want to add a DIFFP_PHASE_TOL <25 mil> to your diff pairs to
control the length between the pairs and not a Rel Prop Delay. All of
the diff pair rules are easily controlled in Constraint manager and I
would recommend only passing the DIFFERENTIAL_PAIR property to define
your pairs and set everything else in Constraint Manager.
Hope this helps,
Michael Catrambone
UTStarcom, Inc.
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dale Rasmusen
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 1:55 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
Hi all, I was wondering how to do the following...
I have diff pairs that need to have REL_PROP_DELAY GRP:G:L:S::25
properties between P and N signals.. but I also want to place 20 of
these pairs in a group that must adhere to a PROP_DELAY of
L:S:1000:2000.
Thus I have P and N constraints as well as a group prop delay
constraint.
I'm not sure how to structure these rules for Allegro. Your help is
appreciated.
Thanks,
Dale Rasmusen
CAD Manager
TEKNOVUS
(707) 665-0400 ext 133
(707) 665-0491 fax
- References:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- From: Michael Catrambone
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- From: Michael Catrambone