[PCB_FORUM] Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- From: Dale Rasmusen <dale.rasmusen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:55:14 -0700
Hi all, I was wondering how to do the following...
I have diff pairs that need to have REL_PROP_DELAY GRP:G:L:S::25 properties
between P and N signals.. but I also want to place 20 of these pairs in a group
that must adhere to a PROP_DELAY of L:S:1000:2000.
Thus I have P and N constraints as well as a group prop delay constraint.
I'm not sure how to structure these rules for Allegro. Your help is
appreciated.
Thanks,
Dale Rasmusen
CAD Manager
TEKNOVUS
(707) 665-0400 ext 133
(707) 665-0491 fax
- Follow-Ups:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- From: Gerry Meier
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- From: Michael Catrambone
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- From: Macindoe, Gary
- References:
- [PCB_FORUM] Verilog to allegro netlist?
- From: arimitsu seiji
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- From: Gerry Meier
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- From: Michael Catrambone
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Propagation Rules driven from Schematic to Allegro
- From: Macindoe, Gary
- [PCB_FORUM] Verilog to allegro netlist?
- From: arimitsu seiji