[PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- From: "Macindoe, Gary" <Gary.Macindoe@xxxxxxx>
- To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:59:45 -0500
Hey Austin,
Sorry, I guess I got the impression that you were also a long time
Allegro user.
George mistakenly said "Positive plane layers have a much larger opening
around pins."
With positive planes, when the shape is created, all clearances, thermal
ties and more is determined by your setup in the Global Dynamic Shape
Parameters form. After the shape is created, you can change all of this
for each shape separately with the shapes individual Dynamic Shape
Instance Parameters form.
Starting to make sense yet?
Gary
Gary E. MacIndoe
PCB Design Engineer
Fort Collins, Colorado
amd.com
gary.macindoe@xxxxxxx
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Austin Franklin
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:15 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
Hi Gary,
I understand why they *could* be different, but...given your
explanation, and more to my confusion, your explanation doesn't say why
positive planes would *always* (which is what was said) have a larger
opening. They could be configured to be smaller couldn't they? It's
all in how you set it up?
Regards,
Austin
-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Macindoe, Gary
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:52 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
You're kidding, right Austin?
With negative planes, the clearance is determined by the
padstack and with positive planes, the clearance is determined by the
shape parameters (changeable on a shape by shape basis).
Gary E. MacIndoe
PCB Design Engineer
Fort Collins, Colorado
amd.com
gary.macindoe@xxxxxxx
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Austin Franklin
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:20 AM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
Hi George,
Why would the openings around pins be any different between
positive and negative planes?
Regards,
Austin
-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
george.h.patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:58 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
Positive plane layers have a much larger opening around
pins. This is fine if you are doing low to medium speed boards (roughly
< 200 MHz clock speed), but on high-speed designs the impedance
discontinuities created by the huge opening around the pins are
significantly greater on a positive plane than on a negative plane.
We use negative planes for this reason, and we always
use Valor to check our artworks to make sure we haven't shot ourselves
in the foot :)
YMMV
--
George Patrick
Tektronix, Inc.
Central Engineering, EDS Applications Support
P.O. Box 500, M/S 39-512
Beaverton, OR 97077-0001
* 503-627-5272 (voice) * 503-627-5587 (fax)
http://www.tektronix.com <http://www.tektronix.com/>
http://www.pcb-designer.com <http://www.pcb-designer.com/>
"Off-Grid and Proud of it!"
-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob McCreight
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 06:51
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Planes: Negative vs.
Positive?
The design team I work with is split one which
to use, negative or positive planes.
What are the pros and cons of each? What do most
people prefer to work with?
We are currently using 15.5.1 but evaluating
16.x for possible future migration.
Thanks for your feedback.
Bob McCreight, C.I.D.
- Follow-Ups:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- From: Austin Franklin
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- From: Michael Catrambone
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- References:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- From: Austin Franklin
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Planes: Negative vs. Positive?
