[PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- From: "Kanakaraj" <k.kanakaraj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:40:33 +0530
MessageHi,
In my project, the customer has given the mechanical dimensions of the
connectors and mouting holes in mm. ( with three digit accuracy like 21.213
mm). I place the connector with milimeter as measurement unit and switch back
to mils for routing.
When we are doing the dimensioning, we again switch back to milimeter, then we
encounter errors upto two decimal points. ( the connector fixed at 21.213mm is
showing as 21.192 mm.. for an example).
have any one encountered issues like this? how can this be fixed.
Regards
~Kanak
----- Original Message -----
From: george.h.patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:39 AM
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
The question remains:
WHY switch back and forth?
If the board is started in one unit, you are making it harder on yourself and
others switching back and forth, even with NO round off errors. The grids are
different, the trace widths are different (unless you LIKE typing two decimal
places all the time). It is senseless to be switching it around, unless it is
just to make extra work for yourself or your international partner. Why not
just KEEP IT SIMPLE (K.I.S.S.) :)
--
George Patrick
Tektronix, Inc.
Central Engineering, PCB Design Group
P.O. Box 500, M/S 39-512
Beaverton, OR 97077-0001
Phone: 503-627-5272 Fax: 503-627-5587
http://www.tektronix.com http://www.pcb-designer.com
It's my opinion, not Tektronix'
-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patrick Jabbaz
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 14:58
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
Here is the trick to make it work, In Allegro,
You can switch units from metric to mils, and vise versa without errors, if
you have the following setup:
User Units mils use 2 decimal places
User Units millimeter use 4 decimal places
Using this process, allows you to switch back and forth without any round
off errors.
Patrick Jabbaz
Sr. PCB Design Eng.
Xilinx
2100 Logic Drive
San Jose, Ca 95124
Direct: 408-879-4709
M: 408-621-6533
email: patrick.jabbaz@xxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Austin Franklin
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 2:26 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
Hi Richard,
Perhaps more than a decade ago, the CPU and code speed may have been an
issue. But, in the realm we are talking about (a printed circuit board and the
range of numbers and precision necessary) IMO and IME the compiler imposes no
significant restrictions, nor does the "math processor" in the CPU. Again, it
is simply a matter of knowing where the decimal point is.
In Allegro, you don't convert because the tool can not handle it. In a
tool that can adequately handle it, this is not an issue.
Regards,
Austin
-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of richard moffat
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:15 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
Cadence is probably making a compromise for speed. The way that other
tools may allow a seemless interchange is to have a greater length of
significant numbers in the internal database, especially converting
metric->imperial.
The programmers are restricted to that they are given: The C compiler,
and the maths processor on the CPU.
In short: don't convert!
>>> austin@xxxxxxxxxxxx 25/08/2005 9:08:15 a.m. >>>
Hi,
> Conversely, 1/10 (0.1) cannot be exactly represented in base 2...
I design ASICs, and I have done a LOT of arithmetic functions in ASICs,
and
use decimal points all the time. All hardware arithmetic functions are
done
in base 2. It's simply a matter of knowing where the decimal point is and
using enough digits. Yet, it goes on to explain the solution (as I said,
knowing where the decimal point is)...so I fail to see the *real* problem.
As was pointed out, PADS has no problem switching back and forth between
the
two unit systems, so I simply don't believe Allegro can't do it as well.
It
seems like this may be a self imposed restriction:
> The real issue is that some numbers can't be represented exactly in the
> standard floating point representation.
Why do they have to use "standard" floating point representation anyway?
Sounds like someone programmed themselves into a corner, and instead
fixing
it, they are trying to come up with explanations...instead of solutions.
Sigh. To me, this is a huge weakness of Allegro.
Regards,
Austin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
This message contains information from GDA Technologies LTD and affiliates,
and is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is
addressed. It may contain information, including any attachments, that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
you are not the intended addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended
addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or
distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message.
If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify the
sender immediately by a "reply to sender only" message and destroy all
electronic and hard copies of the communication, including attachments.
This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender.
--
This message contains information from GDA Technologies LTD and affiliates,
and is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is
addressed. It may contain information, including any attachments, that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
you are not the intended addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended
addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or
distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message.
If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify the
sender immediately by a "reply to sender only" message and destroy all
electronic and hard copies of the communication, including attachments.
This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender.
- References:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- From: george . h . patrick
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Metric to English - English to Metric
- From: george . h . patrick