[PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- From: Ed Caldwell <Ed.Caldwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:43:47 -0400
http://www.polarinstruments.com/
"Jean Bratton" <jean.bratton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
08/29/2007 10:11 AM
Please respond to
icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[PCB_FORUM] Impedance controlled line widths
Hi folks,
We have a design with impedance rules built in at the schematic level. The
stackup appears to be correctly defined as provided to us, but Allegro is
not calculating the trace widths at the same width as the stackup
indicates they should be. The impedance value appears to be the prevailing
rule, not the trace width we have set up in the constraints. If we delete
the impedance property, we can get the board to route with the trace
widths we specify, but we?re wondering if there?s a way to change the
priority?to have it look at what the design rules specify for trace width
rather than what the impedance rule would automatically define.
Also, does anyone know of a good impedance calculator online? The one we
used to use isn?t set up for a board as thick as this one is, so we need
another. We need to know which is accurate, the stackup provided to us, or
the calculations Allegro is making.
Thanks for any insight,
Jean
Jean Bratton
Sr. Printed Circuit Designer
Freedom CAD Services, Inc.
603-864-1349
jean.bratton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Visit us at http://www.freedomcad.com
This correspondence and any attachments are considered confidential. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify Freedom CAD Services,
Inc. immediately by either replying to this message or by sending an email
to operations@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; please destroy all copies of this message
and any attachments. Thank you.
- Follow-Ups:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- From: Davies, Charles \(cdavies\)
- References:
- [PCB_FORUM] Impedance controlled line widths
- From: Jean Bratton
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Impedance controlled line widths
- From: Davies, Charles \(cdavies\)
- [PCB_FORUM] Impedance controlled line widths
- From: Jean Bratton