George, > Not if you change the name. What do you expect it to back annotate TO? > It's the only reference the system has. I guess you want a hidden "Net > Name" that will track the visible "net Name", eh? It has the network as a reference. For example, U2.3 to U4.6. This is not a real difficult problem as far as a tool being able to do this correctly (other tools do it no problem), it's just that this particular tool does not support it...yet. > Sorry, ain't going to happen. > Probably could write an Allegro skill routine to interface with a Concept > skill routine to resolve these kinds of conflicts, but it isn't worth the > hassle. There has to be SOMETHING in control, either the schematic or the > board. You have bought a system that considers the schematic to be in > control. > > Live with it, or go buy something else ;> Cadence said they have it on their list of future updates to the product, so perhaps in a release or two it will work. Which means, either can be "in control". Austin ----------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe/unsubscribe: Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe To view the archives of this list please login at //www.freelists.org. Our list name is icu-pcb-forum or go to //www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/ Problems or Questions: Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Want to post a job listing ? DON'T DO IT HERE! Better yet, join our jobs listing forum. SUBSCRIBE: icu-jobs-forum-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxx POST: icu-jobs-forum@xxxxxxxxxx -----------------------------------------------------------