[PCB_FORUM] Re: Allegro 16.01 question
- From: "Gene Carman" <gcarman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:40:00 -0800
Using 16.0 on XP and while the routing is stable and open GL offers some
nice new ways to view things, the dynamic shapes seem "wimpier." The
new icons take some getting used to as does Constraint Manager.
However, we do a lot of RF design with curved lines, and dynamic shapes,
once applied, tend to crash quite often when shoving traces or making
minor modifications to clean up a design...
I have seen "ERROR IN DESIGN POINTER TO MEMORY HOLE INVALID Error
cannot be fixed" far too many times for my taste.
Perhaps 16.01 is more stable.
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Crittenden,
Mike
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 7:14 AM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Allegro 16.01 question
How many have upgraded to 16.01 using windows vista or XP and are happy
with the performance and stability of allegro? We are still using 15.7
but a number of our engineers are getting new pc's with the vista os.
We never upgraded to 16.0 because of all of the problems I heard about
but we know have enough engineers with vista machines that we are going
to have to make the jump soon. Just curious.
Thanks!
Mike Crittenden
Sr. PCB Designer
Phase IV Systems, Inc.
3405 Triana Blvd.
Huntsville, AL 35805
Direct: (256) 535-2118
Main: (256) 535-2100
email: mike.crittenden@xxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [PCB_FORUM] Allegro 16.01 question
- From: Crittenden, Mike
- [PCB_FORUM] Allegro 16.01 question
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] Allegro 16.01 question
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Allegro 16.01 question
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Allegro 16.01 question
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Allegro 16.01 question
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Allegro 16.01 question
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Allegro 16.01 question
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Allegro 16.01 question
