[PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.2 'derived from' padstack issue SOLVED?
- From: Kevin McCowan <kmccowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 09:18:25 -0400
Why not replace the padstacks with the ones you want?
Then, when you have layers back in, you won't have
future problems.
Just a thought...
Kevin McCowan
Sr. PCB Designer
TSI Telsys
Dharma Kemp-Bresett wrote:
I believe I have figured out the problem. These symbols were dumped from
a .brd file. When I remove all the internal layers from the
cross-section then I can do a refresh and get them all. The display
element still says 'derived from' but the padstacks actually refreshed.
Dharma
-----Original Message-----
*From:* icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Dharma
Kemp-Bresett
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 17, 2005 2:29 PM
*To:* icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [PCB_FORUM] 15.2 'derived from' padstack issue
Hi All,
I am in 15.2 and am trying to update and refresh padstacks in some
symbols we received from a customer but have run into a snag. I
cannot replace or refresh all padstacks in a symbol at once, even if
they are all the same, if there is a derived from note( I say note
as it does not appear in the properties but does on the display
element for the pin)on them. Example: I have a connector with 40
pins all the same padstack except that all pins except 1 and 40 say
derived from. If I do a refresh, replace or update to design only
the non-derived pads appear to update. I have also tried doing an
edit both with and without the "include derived padstacks box"
clicked. Nothing seems to work. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Dharma
KAW/USA Ltd.
39 Simon Street, #4
Nashua, NH 03060
603-886-8711 x212
603-881-8763 fax
-----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe/unsubscribe:
Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe
To view the archives of this list please login at
http://www.freelists.org. Our list name is icu-pcb-forum
or go to http://www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/
Problems or Questions:
Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Want to post a job listing ? DON'T DO IT HERE!
Better yet, join our jobs listing forum.
SUBSCRIBE: icu-jobs-forum-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
POST: icu-jobs-forum@xxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.2 'derived from' padstack issue SOLVED?
- From: Dharma Kemp-Bresett
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.2 'derived from' padstack issue SOLVED?
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.2 'derived from' padstack issue SOLVED?
Dharma
-----Original Message-----
*From:* icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Dharma
Kemp-Bresett
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 17, 2005 2:29 PM
*To:* icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [PCB_FORUM] 15.2 'derived from' padstack issueHi All,
I am in 15.2 and am trying to update and refresh padstacks in some
symbols we received from a customer but have run into a snag. I
cannot replace or refresh all padstacks in a symbol at once, even if
they are all the same, if there is a derived from note( I say note
as it does not appear in the properties but does on the display
element for the pin)on them. Example: I have a connector with 40
pins all the same padstack except that all pins except 1 and 40 say
derived from. If I do a refresh, replace or update to design only
the non-derived pads appear to update. I have also tried doing an
edit both with and without the "include derived padstacks box"
clicked. Nothing seems to work. What am I doing wrong? Thanks,
Dharma
KAW/USA Ltd.
39 Simon Street, #4
Nashua, NH 03060
603-886-8711 x212
603-881-8763 fax- [PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.2 'derived from' padstack issue SOLVED?
- From: Dharma Kemp-Bresett