[ibis-quality] Minutes from the 4 Oct 2011 ibis-quality meeting
- From: Mike LaBonte <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ibis-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:45:15 -0400
Minutes from the 4 Oct 2011 ibis-quality meeting are attached. Mike
Minutes, IBIS Quality Committee 04 October 2011 11:00-12:00 EST (08:00-09:00 PST) ROLL CALL Cisco Systems: Tony Penaloza Ericsson: * Anders Ekholm Green Streak Programs: Lynne Green Huawei Technologies: Guan Tao IBM: Bruce Archambeault Greg Edlund IOMethodology: Lance Wang Mentor Graphics: John Angulo Micron Technology: Moshiul Haque, Randy Wolff Nokia Siemens Networks: * Eckhard Lenski QLogic Corp.: James Zhou Signal Consulting Group: Tim Coyle Signal Integrity Software * Mike LaBonte Teraspeed Consulting Group: * Bob Ross Texas Instruments: Pavani Jella Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for opens and IBIS related patent disclosures: - Mike: I am now affiliated with SiSoft AR Review: - Mike notify Tim Coyle of BIRD 142 passage - Done - Mike post AMI checklist to archive - TBD - Greg update AMI checklist items 2.1 through 2.3 - No report - Mike ask Lynne Green about AMI model review - Done - No AMI models have been submitted so far - Lynne noted that the divide between EE and CS majors may be an issue. - The parser could at least check for the existence of DLL files - Lynne suggested a few possible quality checks - Bob: The checks are performed confidentially by individual EDA vendors - Models from IC vendors are not shared with other IC vendors - Mike: It would be good to use this valuable services - Maybe an issue is that the reviewers are unknown - Mike add descriptions to AMI checklist - No changes made - Mike add QUAILs to Mantis - No progress - Bob conduct tests of parser behavior for test keywords - No progress New items: Bob: Greg sent email about the samples per bit issue: - Mike showed Greg's email thread - Bob: It can be a problem if two models have different requirements - Greg believes that would be a problem - Mike: A least common denominator rate can be used - Bob: There can be some bad combinations though - Mike: A quality model would not need samples_per_bit Mike showed the AMI checklist: - Mike: Where would a samples_per_bit check go? - Bob: Under Usage, maybe accuracy AMI checklist item 2.5: - Mike: This is about the same as 2.4 - Tools should keep these separate now anyway - Anders: The tools do not keep them completely separate - They use fixed file names - Mike: Is there a BIRD about loading extra DLL files? - Anders: Walter has one about instance IDs - Also support files Next meetings: - Next meetings Oct 11 and Oct 18 Oct 11 agenda: - Continued IBIS-AMI checklist review Meeting ended at 11:59 Eastern Time.
Other related posts:
- » [ibis-quality] Minutes from the 4 Oct 2011 ibis-quality meeting - Mike LaBonte