[huskerlug] bandwidth limiting
- From: "J.R. Wessels" <jwessels@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: HLUG <huskerlug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Apr 2002 20:21:30 -0500
I now have bandwidth limiting working on my 486 firewall, and is holding
up well. I was concerned with the limited amount of ram the firewall
has - only 8. 2.4 with iptables, cbq for the limiting, redirection to
my proxy for http, iptraf for some monitoring, internal ssh for admin
purposes, dhcp for the clients - it all works. Below is a copy/paste of
the config for limiting Gnutella/Napster on my network. Already, I've
seen in the stats of the CBQ script it has been quite active in policing
the traffic - even though I consider 102 kbits total in/out traffic to
be lax. Just goes to show how inefficient those networks are.
DEVICE=eth1,10Mbit,1Mbit
RATE=102Kbit
WEIGHT=10Kbit
PRIO=5
# GNUTELLA
RULE=:6346,10.0.0.0/8
RULE=:5634,10.0.0.0/8
RULE=10.0.0.3:55000
RULE=10.0.0.2:35000
# NAPSTER
RULE=:6699,10.0.0.0/8
RULE=:6700,10.0.0.0/8
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: signature.asc
-- Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQA8tOUYTcxiguQWkWQRAiibAJ9YImR2HkxxWWmfr5TLjUINI2gFpwCgq2ho
CY/+dsxrajPvk/rNYcE7n+Y=
=xllv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----
Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
Other related posts:
