[huskerlug] Try again (sigh!)


[Well, I guess I have to see if this message makes it to the 
list!---Jim]

        My last message about the Fortune article didn't get through, 
in that
when you click to read the rest of the article, they want you to 
subscribe to the magazine, or at least give a whole lot of 
information.  Now that wasn't going to happen to me.  So, anyone else 
who is interested will have to wait until the article gets to his 
doctor's or dentist's office, when the case might make it to court.
        Oh, Microsoft was using another Open OS for it's Hotmail at 
least at
one time and that was FreeBSD, or at least one of the BSD's, so 
there's another one that Microsoft can avoiding commenting on.  ---Jim



On Tuesday 22 July 2003 07:03, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2003 05:37 am, you wrote:
> > Yep, it's about SCO, and a note to Gray Geek, it's only 2 weeks
> > old. Anyway, for what it's worth, which may not be that much.  The
> > court case could go on for years.  ---Jim
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,462985,
> >0 0.html
>
> Only one in a barrage of Anti-Linux FUD 'news' pouring out of=20
> Microsoft sites and from M$ sychophants.   Here's an example of
> one=20 such store from CNET, disected.  As you read this disection,
> ask=20 yourself "Who is liable for the Microsoft OS?"   Or, asksed
> more=20 directly, "who has sued M$ for breach of EULA and won?"  
> So, the=20 question of liability has always been moot, except when
> certain spin=20 miesters are talking about Linux.
>
> http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=3D10564
>
>
> =2D-=20
> =2D
> GrayGeek
>

----
Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE

Other related posts: