[huskerlug] Re: Mount problems

Actually, I ended up using umask as a mount option... here is a sample
of my fstab file.

/dev/hda1 /mnt/WindowsXP ntfs
iocharset=8859-1,sync,codepage=850,noauto,exec 0 0

/dev/hdb1 /mnt/FTP vfat auto,user,rw,umask=0000 0 0

(ignore the wrap around)

This seems to work fine - all my users have permissions that they need.

Thanks again for your help - you mentioning dmask made me think of umask
- but as you said, they are very similar so I could have used either I
suppose.

Later,
John


On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 14:32, Ben Chavet wrote:
> Well, I don't think that umask is a mount option, but if you're talking about
> the umask command, it works a lot like the fmask & dmask options.  It forces 
> any
> files or directories you create to have the permission mask given to the umask
> command.  
> 
> From the bash man page:
> 
>        umask [-p] [-S] [mode]
>               The user file-creation mask is set to mode.  If mode begins with
>               a  digit,  it is interpreted as an octal number; otherwise it is
>               interpreted as a symbolic mode mask similar to that accepted  by
>               chmod(1).   If mode is omitted, the current value of the mask is
>               printed.  The -S option causes the mask to be  printed  in  sym-
>               bolic  form;  the  default output is an octal number.  If the -p
>               option is supplied, and mode is omitted, the output is in a form
>               that may be reused as input.  The return status is 0 if the mode
>               was successfully changed or if no mode  argument  was  supplied,
>               and false otherwise.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Quoting "John P. DiMartino" <john_dimartino@xxxxxxx>:
> 
> > Thanks for the help.  I used to know that but forgot :).
> > 
> > Anyway - is umask the same as dmask and fmask except that umask works
> > with the subtraction of permissions?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > John
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 11:20, Ben Chavet wrote:
> > > use dmask and fmask.  set them to 770 or 777 if you want all users to have
> > > read/write access.
> > > 
> > > Quoting "John P. DiMartino" <john_dimartino@xxxxxxx>:
> > > 
> > > > I have a computer that dual boots Mandrake 9.1 and WinXP. I also run FTP
> > > > servers on both (they have users with passwords, chrooted).  I keep
> > > > running into a problem though.  I can't seem to give access to my
> > > > windows mounts to all users.  I know I can add the line uid=500 so that
> > > > one user can use the drive, but what is the fstab line to give EVERYBODY
> > > > access to that drive?  This is what I had - and I thought it worked but
> > > > it doesn't.
> > > >
> > > > /dev/hda1 /mnt/FTP vfat auto,user,rw 0 0
> > > > 
> > > > I also tried
> > > > 
> > > > /dev/hda1 /mnt/FTP vfat defaults 0 0
> > > > 
> > > > ... do you guys have any hints as to what I am doing wrong?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > John
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ----
> > > > Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> > > > To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----
> > > Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> > > To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> 
> 


----
Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE

Other related posts: