[huskerlug] Re: Fortune.com - Intro - Penguin Slayer
- From: GrayGeek <jkreps@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: huskerlug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 07:03:37 -0500
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 05:37 am, you wrote:
> Yep, it's about SCO, and a note to Gray Geek, it's only 2 weeks
> old. Anyway, for what it's worth, which may not be that much. The
> court case could go on for years. ---Jim
>
>
>
> http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,462985,0
>0.html
Only one in a barrage of Anti-Linux FUD 'news' pouring out of=20
Microsoft sites and from M$ sychophants. Here's an example of one=20
such store from CNET, disected. As you read this disection, ask=20
yourself "Who is liable for the Microsoft OS?" Or, asksed more=20
directly, "who has sued M$ for breach of EULA and won?" So, the=20
question of liability has always been moot, except when certain spin=20
miesters are talking about Linux.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=3D10564
=2D-=20
=2D
GrayGeek
----
Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
- Follow-Ups:
- [huskerlug] Re: Fortune.com - Intro - Penguin Slayer
- From: Patrick
- References:
- [huskerlug] Fortune.com - Intro - Penguin Slayer
- From: Jim Worrest
Other related posts:
- » [huskerlug] Fortune.com - Intro - Penguin Slayer
- » [huskerlug] Re: Fortune.com - Intro - Penguin Slayer
- » [huskerlug] Re: Fortune.com - Intro - Penguin Slayer
- » [huskerlug] Re: Fortune.com - Intro - Penguin Slayer
- » [huskerlug] Re: Fortune.com - Intro - Penguin Slayer
- [huskerlug] Re: Fortune.com - Intro - Penguin Slayer
- From: Patrick
- [huskerlug] Fortune.com - Intro - Penguin Slayer
- From: Jim Worrest