[huskerlug] Re: Backups
- From: Patrick <pberry26@xxxxxxxxx>UNEXPECTED_DATA_AFTER_ADDRESS@.SYNTAX-ERROR
- To: huskerlug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
I wouldn't talk Microsoft here, except that it is a
fact of life that everyone we advocate Open Source to,
including College Boards (who tax all of us, with a
Microsoft tax!) thinks that it is the only OS that
exists!
As advocates of Open Source, we cannot afford to be
incorrect, and want to advocate GNU/Linux choices
foremost. But, there are some areas, some
applications, not yet fully fulfilled by any GNU/Linux
application. Happily, this is being rectified at the
rate of over several dozen new applications each day
at http://sourceforge.net.
I cite my hardware on MS OSes
unreliability/destruction vs. Open Source
stability/reliability, as one of the major problems
that is seldom addressed in any literature, and I seek
some credible statistics of hardware reliability to
back up my own experiences.
I predict that the TOC (Total Ownership Cost) debate,
that was warped by MS into some kind of double-speak
for their marketing effort, will be replaced by a
genuine and unshakable dissertation on the unreliable
aspects their OSes introduce in the most stable
hardware platforms/processors/storage devices.
This argument is a very on-topic one, concerning where
the world spends it's money on the IT infrastucture!
--- Gary Kearney <gkearney@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I seem to have had much better luck with ME than
> most people. Perhaps it's =
> because I try not to trust the OS as much as
> possible. I don't use "FindFas=
> t" and disable the "extras" and "helpful" parts of
> all the MS products that=
> I can find. I have had one hard drive failure in
> the four years that I've =
> owned the computer
OK, so Microsoft OS comes with certain 'defaults' in
place, that destroy equipment within 3-4 months!
The installer/user must track down, at great expense
in time/resources, all the default problems and repair
them!?
> I'm using Word 2000 as part of the Works program
> that came with the compute=
> r. I plan to uninstall it and use Open Office as
> soon as I finish a book pr=
> oject. I used to like the old MS Works 4 program
> before it had been complet=
> ely Micro$ofted. I still use an old copy of
> Publisher 97 for the same reaso=
> n. M$ adds all the "Helpful" crap like "Clippie" and
> tons of other junk and=
> hides all the settings and other things you can use
> to create a useful env=
> ironment from the junk they set you up with.
Who 'owns' your data? If you have to convert, then
you are serving a master who cares nothing about your
work!
The thrashing of my drives, when using any of the
stolen code that MS has re-mal-formed to be their
non-standards compliant word processor(s), is not
something I will tolerate, nor, will my clients.
>
> I hate all the bloat, and that seems to have become
> the pardigm for the who=
> le Window$ world. I just had another program that I
> used to like, update it=
> self almost to the point of unusability.
> Unfortunately I converted my data =
> before I found out about the problems. Live and
> learn.
If a 'standard' is complied with, in any application,
then no data should ever have to be converted!
> I have a number of graphics programs that work only
> under Windows or I'd be=
> using Linux right now. Gimp does a lot of what I
> need, but not everything,=
> so I'm stuck with M$ for a few more months while I
> investigate alternative=
> s.
Try http://sourceforge.net and click on the 'software
map' header to open up all the catagories of
applications and programs available.
Who uses GNU/Linux? You can now add the 'Gnomes of
Munich'
http://linux.bryanconsulting.com/stories/storyReader$45
> > All machinery breaks eventually. I have over 25
> > systems here. Two run winME. Guess which ones
> break
> > most often? I mean that the hard drives crash,
> loose
> > sectors, start to constantly seek, with that
> clacking
> > sound, etc. Only the Microsoft ones! Even on the
> > dual boot machines, with identical models of
> drives in
> > hdc: (Open Source) and C: (MS)!
=====
Patrick
Linux User #65411 http://lugww.counter.li.org
http://yolinux.com for all your questions!
http://distrowatch.com for Linux!
http://sourceforge.net 63,422+ FREE games, programs!
X-No-Archive:Yes
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
----
Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
- Follow-Ups:
- [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- From: Jim Worrest
- References:
- [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- From: Gary Kearney
Other related posts:
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- » [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- From: Jim Worrest
- [huskerlug] Re: Backups
- From: Gary Kearney