On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:48:01PM +0200, Xin Gu wrote: > On 27/02/12 14:34, Diego Biurrun wrote: > >>I have one suggestion: for the function declaration in the header > >>file, I suggest that we can eliminate this kind of const because it > >>makes no sense for the API caller. > >Having declaration and definition differ opens a very scary can of worms > >IMO, let's not go down this road. I very much miss a gcc option to > >scream and shout at such abuses. > > Hmm, well, it just a suggestion. Could you tell me what is this gcc > option? I meant that I "miss" the option because none exists (AFAIK) and I would like to see one implemented. Diego