On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:25:23AM +0000, Miika Komu wrote: > > On 26/02/12 16:34, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 09:52:17AM +0000, Miika Komu wrote: > > >> Diego, I believe Xin has addressed the main issues, can we proceed to > > >> merge? We will continue to polish the library but we'd like to a get a > > >> more stable base for further work. > > > No, the branch still has pending needs-fixing reviews and central issues > > > like the naming remain undecided. > > > > What is your opinion related to this naming issue? Previous we propose > > to call it libhipl instead of libhipdaemon. > > Since it will requires some efforts to change this, I hope we can agree > > on a new name soon. > > I suggested earlier: > * lib/hipl for the directory hierarchy I don't think grouping all of that stuff together below lib/ is a bad idea, just put it in its separate directory. I previously said I wanted to move lib/core and lib/tool together, I would still like to. > * libhipl.{so.a} for the resulting binary Fine with me. Diego