[hipl-commit] [tiny] Rev 3555: Fixed little spelling mistakes in comments.

  • From: Tim Just <tim.just@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: hipl-commit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:20:51 +0200

Committer: Tim Just <tim.just@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Feb 23 15:19:57 2010 +0100
Revision: 3555
Revision-id: tim.just@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Branch nick: tiny

Log:
  Fixed little spelling mistakes in comments.

Modified:
  M  hipd/input.c

=== modified file 'hipd/input.c'
--- hipd/input.c        2010-02-23 11:06:08 +0000
+++ hipd/input.c        2010-02-23 14:19:57 +0000
@@ -1845,7 +1845,7 @@
             }
         }
 
-        /* This far we have succesfully produced the keying material (key),
+        /* This far we have successfully produced the keying material (key),
          * identified which HIP transform is use (hip_tfm), retrieved pointers
          * both to the encrypted HOST_ID (host_id_in_enc) and initialization
          * vector (iv) and we know the length of the encrypted HOST_ID
@@ -2143,7 +2143,7 @@
     /* As for the above todo item:
      *
      * Where is it said that we should wait for ESP or implementation
-     * specific time here? This far we have succesfully verified and
+     * specific time here? This far we have successfully verified and
      * processed the I2 message (except the LOCATOR parameter) and sent an
      * R2 as an response. We are here at state UNASSOCIATED. From Section
      * 4.4.2. of RFC 5201 we learn that if I2 processing was successful, we

Other related posts:

  • » [hipl-commit] [tiny] Rev 3555: Fixed little spelling mistakes in comments. - Tim Just