[HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Bernard <bernard_cousineau@xxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:09:03 -0400
My point was that there is a difference in the final product, It may be
slight but a difference non the less. BTW I was talking to a friend who
works in a lab today about lightjet prints, it's interesting to note
that Kodak uses 316dpi and durst is using 400dpi. even an Epson 1400
prints at 720dpi, giving you better quality.
I went to an exhibit last week that included both lightjet and inkjet (giclée)
prints, and I would say that your conclusion is not necessarily accurate. The
lightjet prints were a little bit nicer than the inkjets. They had smoother
tonality, and better colour gradation. The sharpness was not noticeably different.
There were also a few C prints that were even nicer.
This particular exhibit provided a good comparison because some shots were
printed using both technologies, albeit in different sizes.
I think that the Epson uses dithering, which means that the resolution numbers
should only be compared to other Epson printers of the same generation. I don't
know how you would compare 720 dpi spread out over 8 or more ink nozzles with
316 dpi from 3 lasers.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Mark Rabiner
- References:
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Bob Adler
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Sue Pearce
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Franc Flipsen
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] tripods
- » [HUG ] tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Bob Adler
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Sue Pearce
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Franc Flipsen