[HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Bernard Ferster <b.ferster@xxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:21:08 -0500
At 04:49 PM 10/14/2008, you wrote:
we did willfully degrade quality for convenience. We went from 8x10
to 4x5 to 120, then to 35mm and even to 126/110/disc and eventually
to the dreadful APS format.
No, we did not. Kodak and Fugi may have, but not this intrepid group
of folk, many of whom still shlep many pounds of glass and finely
machined steel to the the National Parks, to weddings and studios.
And those of us forced into digital format because of economics, or
the weakness of old age, well know we do so under diress.
...........................B.F..........................
- References:
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Bob Adler
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Sue Pearce
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Remi Lemarchand
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] tripods
- » [HUG ] tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Bob Adler
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Sue Pearce
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Remi Lemarchand