[HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Bob Adler <rgacpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Q.G.,
You are absolutely correct from a techincal standpoint. But I believe there is
still a problem with comparing digital camera files to scanned negatives on a
purely technical basis. Software must interpret what is scanned into what you
see. I've been scanning Velvia on a Nikon 9000 for years now, and I believe
that the color fidelity is better on my Canon DSLR than on these scanned
images. My scanned images were about 400MB in size.
That's certainly not to say you can't get gorgeous images from a scanned
tranny. John Gavrilis ( http://www.gavrilisphotography.com/home.html ;)produces
stunning prints from drum scans of 4x5 and LightJet prints. So does Jim Brick (
http://www.visualimpressions.com ).
But I couldn't afford a drum scanner (even an Imacon drum-like scanner). So I
have found that my DSLR images have more fidelity, contrast and better printed
image quality than what I was able to obtain from my Nikon scanner. Since I've
never done darkroom work, this was a more affordable option for me vs buying a
better scanner, etc.
Just my opinion,
Bob
Bob Adler
Palo Alto, CA
rgacpa@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.raflexions.com
----- Original Message ----
From: Q.G. de Bakker <qnu@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 11:00:57 AM
Subject: [HUG ] Re: tripods
Jim Brick wrote:
> Scans come in bytes not pixels. You can get 16 bit RGB drum scans up to
> 1200 Mb (megabytes) or grayscale 16 bit scans up to 370 Mb.
>
> These are huge files!
The more proper unit however is the pixel. The size in bytes contains info
about how much colour/tone info could be (!) recorded per pixel.
1200 MB @ 16 bit per pixel is an image counting 629.145.600 pixels (about
600 megapixel).
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Sue Pearce
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] tripods
- » [HUG ] tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- » [HUG ] Re: tripods
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG ] Re: tripods
- From: Sue Pearce