[HUG ] Re: swc for sale?

or - you are saying you don't like angle of view..

no matter really. off to work for me.

Eric

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Eric Korenman <faneuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I may have mistyped.
>
> I DO support angle of view.
>
> Eric
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>> Eric.... this is, in my opinion, flawed thinking....
>>
>> Technical terms should be used correctly.  If they are not, the meaning
>> becomes obscured.....
>>
>> Try "APO" for example of a word that has so many different meanings that its
>> use has become useless......
>>
>> Angle of view is precise, descriptive, and independent of format size.
>>
>> Hasselblad always speced their lenses this way......  and others used to put
>> angle of view in the ads and specs of their lens lines ( Nikon, Canon,
>> Leica, and others).
>>
>> And Yes, I do remember the "Metrification of the USA".  Utter Failure.
>>
>> Frank Filippone
>> red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> angle of view make so sense in these days of a melange of sensors sizes.
>> but getting people to talk about AOV would be like getting the US to
>> convert to the metric system (any remember 1975??)
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> =============================================================================================================
>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
>> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you 
>> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>>
>>
>

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: