[HUG ] Re: swc for sale?

I may have mistyped.

I DO support angle of view.

Eric

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric.... this is, in my opinion, flawed thinking....
>
> Technical terms should be used correctly.  If they are not, the meaning
> becomes obscured.....
>
> Try "APO" for example of a word that has so many different meanings that its
> use has become useless......
>
> Angle of view is precise, descriptive, and independent of format size.
>
> Hasselblad always speced their lenses this way......  and others used to put
> angle of view in the ads and specs of their lens lines ( Nikon, Canon,
> Leica, and others).
>
> And Yes, I do remember the "Metrification of the USA".  Utter Failure.
>
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> angle of view make so sense in these days of a melange of sensors sizes.
> but getting people to talk about AOV would be like getting the US to
> convert to the metric system (any remember 1975??)
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>
> =============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you 
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
>

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: