[HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV

2000 English Pounds at Teamwork, England.  No lens.

 

The ARC body is cheaper.

 

Frank Filippone

red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

From: hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Korenman
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 7:48 PM
To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV

 

I think this would do the trick - the silvestri flexicam:

http://www.linhofstudio.com/products/cameras/silvestri/Silvestri/Flexicam_en
g2.pdf

 

anyone know prices?


Eric



 

On Feb 18, 2008 7:42 PM, Eric Korenman <faneuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Also a lot of $$$

:)

 

E

On Feb 18, 2008 7:21 PM, Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Feb 18, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Eric Korenman wrote:

> Goal: an SWC with the ability to tilt, shift & swing.



Don't forget rise & fall. You need an ARC body with a Rodenstock Apo-
Grandagon 35/4.5 lens. It gives you exactly what you want.

Jim


============================================================================
=================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org
<http://www.freelists.org/>  and logon to your account (the same e-mail
address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from
there.

Other related posts: