[HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: "Eric Korenman" <faneuil@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:55:08 -0500
I have found adapters to put blads backs onto view cameras.
Was just wondering about putting a whole 203 shebang on the back.
I think it is the wonder of the CFV back and its flexibility that I want to
explore.
Given that you can trigger the back so easily, it can be put onto anything.
I keep imagining it on the back of a compact view camera with the ability to
get some really nice architectural and landscape shots.
Goal: an SWC with the ability to tilt, shift & swing.
Eric
On 2/18/08, Q.G. de Bakker <qnu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Frank Filippone wrote:
>
> >I understand, but the sensor is substantially smaller than 56x56 mm. It
> is
> > in the center of the normal image area. While there could be some image
> > cutoff in the VF, it would be outside the sensor area, and therefore not
> > relevant.
> >
> > Since the sensor is always centered in the 56x56, no matter how you
> twist
> > the camera, the sensor is always centered, and therefore, for any
> > practical
> > movement that I can think of, even with long telephoto lenses, there is
> no
> > cutoff at the sensor.
>
> Maybe not. Maybe so.
>
> I have had a Hasselblad body behind a Sinar (who said Sinars aren't
> sturdy???), and the extra tunnel formed by the mirror house did indeed
> cause
> problems: vignetting when movements were used.
> So never again.
>
> How much of a problem it is of course depends on how big these movements
> are.
>
> But - and this is the thing - it would be far easier (unless you want to
> use the metering system in the Hasselblad) to just put the back straight
> onto the view camera. Adapters to do that are easier to find than those to
> hang a body on a view camera.
> So why even consider the hassle?
>
>
>
>
>
> =============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Jim Brick
- References:
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Bernard Cousineau
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- » [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Bernard Cousineau
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: revisit 6x9 view camera with CFV
- From: Q.G. de Bakker