[HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- From: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 08:18:30 -0700
OK... Yes, I used Polaroids years ago when in the commercial
photography business. I still have the Polaroid back for my 4x5
Linhof, but I haven't used it for instant film in years. I have
recently used Type 55 Polaroid film but processed it in my darkroom
rather than using the goo in the packet, in the field, and having to
carry sodium sulfite with me.
I don't believe that James in a commercial photographer or doing
studio photography for clients. Which is why I said that I believe
that Polaroid would be a waste of money for him.
IMHO,
:-)
Jim
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- From: Austin Franklin
- References:
- [HUG ] polaroid backs
- From: JAMES WILLIAMS
- [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- From: Karl Wolz
- [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- From: BOB KISS
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- » [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- From: Austin Franklin
- [HUG ] polaroid backs
- From: JAMES WILLIAMS
- [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- From: Karl Wolz
- [HUG ] Re: polaroid backs
- From: BOB KISS