[HUG ] Re: dumb acumatte screen question
- From: Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:43:00 -0400
The older ones you can barely see through at all. The Acumats are like
Beattie or Maxwell screens. A couple of stops brighter at least. Night and
Day almost..
mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mark William Rabiner
> From: Eric Korenman <faneuil@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:38:28 -0400
> To: HUG <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [HUG ] dumb acumatte screen question
>
> If there a quick and reliable way to tell the difference between
> acumatte and non-acumatte screens?
> I thought the older ones have coarser, more visible lines?
>
> Eric
>
> ==============================================================================
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [HUG ] dumb acumatte screen question
- From: Eric Korenman
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] dumb acumatte screen question
- » [HUG ] Re: dumb acumatte screen question
- » [HUG ] Re: dumb acumatte screen question
- » [HUG ] Re: dumb acumatte screen question
- » [HUG ] Re: dumb acumatte screen question
- » [HUG ] Re: dumb acumatte screen question
- [HUG ] dumb acumatte screen question
- From: Eric Korenman