[HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Bernard Ferster <b.ferster@xxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 08:57:21 -0400
At 06:22 PM 5/6/2008, you wrote:
Bernard,
Is it possible that you respect Jims wishes and stop this non
photographic topic?
Done!
It has been asked several times before.
Please check this thread and do not post these posts for the second time.
Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:b.ferster@xxxxxxx>Bernard Ferster
To: <mailto:hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 11:54 PM
Subject: [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
At 01:36 AM 5/6/2008, you wrote:
At 02:21 AM 5/6/2008, JAMES WILLIAMS wrote:
The sagging of the US dollar is more political than economical,
the US government likes our dollar worth less because then other
countries will buy our goods. They are more concerned with making
companies more money( you know the trickle down effect, lol). Hope
I did not push anyones buttons, but sometime the truth hurts lol.
But the real question is what is the truth? lol
That is hardly "truth": it is wild lunacy. The US government does
not control the value of the dollar in international trade; that
is set by the free market.
Not entirely so. The Administration has let the market to do it's
worst, but there was much it could have done to bolster the value of
the dollar. Like better control of interest rates, paying for the
expenses of Mr. Bush's war by increasing taxes instead of resorting
to borrowing, slowing down import of oil, and other devices best
explained by an economist.
The dollar has recently fallen for a number of reasons. One
primary cause is the insistence of the oil market to continue to
peg the price of crude oil in US dollars: as the Chinese demand
for oil has gone up, this has pressured the dollar to decline in
value relative to the Chinese Yuan and, then, to the British Pound
and to the Euro. There are other causes, but they are of a like
nature. The feeding frenzy of our government (Republican and
Democrat Parties alike) has not helped, nor have the costs of the
Wars in South-East Asia.
You have the basic idea. But each of the items you mentioned, with
the exception, perhaps, of Chinese behavior, is subject to influence
by Administration practices. (Oh yes, the Bushies among us will
share the blame with the Congress, forgetting that the veto power is
in the White House. A fuller explanation is available, off line, to
Subjects of the Queen, and folk from Parliamentary nations.)
In the short run, the cheap dollar will benefit the US. Our goods
will cost less overseas and we will have to pay more for
imports. That will help to adjust the balance of trade problem we
have had since the days of Lyndon Johnson. In the long run, the
dollar will rebound.
John Maynard Keynes said, with irrefutable accuracy, that "In the
long run we are all dead." In the short run, foreigners touring the
US are finding great bargains.
Those of our members who point out that the world has far more
pressing problems that the success of H are quite correct and to be
honored for their humanity. Alas, we can not even keep a small
camera company alive - how ever do we control genocide, aggressive
war and greedy gas gobbling SUV owners.
...........................B.F..........................
.............................B.F......................................
- References:
- [HUG ] The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: JAMES WILLIAMS
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Marc James Small
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Bernard Ferster
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: flexbody
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
Bernard,Is it possible that you respect Jims wishes and stop this non photographic topic?
It has been asked several times before. Please check this thread and do not post these posts for the second time. Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: <mailto:b.ferster@xxxxxxx>Bernard Ferster To: <mailto:hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 11:54 PM Subject: [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics At 01:36 AM 5/6/2008, you wrote:
At 02:21 AM 5/6/2008, JAMES WILLIAMS wrote:The sagging of the US dollar is more political than economical, the US government likes our dollar worth less because then other countries will buy our goods. They are more concerned with making companies more money( you know the trickle down effect, lol). Hope I did not push anyones buttons, but sometime the truth hurts lol. But the real question is what is the truth? lolThat is hardly "truth": it is wild lunacy. The US government does not control the value of the dollar in international trade; that is set by the free market.
Not entirely so. The Administration has let the market to do it's worst, but there was much it could have done to bolster the value of the dollar. Like better control of interest rates, paying for the expenses of Mr. Bush's war by increasing taxes instead of resorting to borrowing, slowing down import of oil, and other devices best explained by an economist.
The dollar has recently fallen for a number of reasons. One primary cause is the insistence of the oil market to continue to peg the price of crude oil in US dollars: as the Chinese demand for oil has gone up, this has pressured the dollar to decline in value relative to the Chinese Yuan and, then, to the British Pound and to the Euro. There are other causes, but they are of a like nature. The feeding frenzy of our government (Republican and Democrat Parties alike) has not helped, nor have the costs of the Wars in South-East Asia.
You have the basic idea. But each of the items you mentioned, with the exception, perhaps, of Chinese behavior, is subject to influence by Administration practices. (Oh yes, the Bushies among us will share the blame with the Congress, forgetting that the veto power is in the White House. A fuller explanation is available, off line, to Subjects of the Queen, and folk from Parliamentary nations.)
In the short run, the cheap dollar will benefit the US. Our goods will cost less overseas and we will have to pay more for imports. That will help to adjust the balance of trade problem we have had since the days of Lyndon Johnson. In the long run, the dollar will rebound.
John Maynard Keynes said, with irrefutable accuracy, that "In the long run we are all dead." In the short run, foreigners touring the US are finding great bargains.
Those of our members who point out that the world has far more pressing problems that the success of H are quite correct and to be honored for their humanity. Alas, we can not even keep a small camera company alive - how ever do we control genocide, aggressive war and greedy gas gobbling SUV owners.
...........................B.F..........................
- [HUG ] The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: JAMES WILLIAMS
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Marc James Small
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Bernard Ferster
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: flexbody