[HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: "flexbody" <flexbody@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 00:53:41 +0200
Thanks Q.G.
Congratulations with a clean looking ERC!
Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: Q.G. de Bakker
To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 12:42 AM
Subject: [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
It will die a slow, but certain death. Be patient.
No use in arguing about not arguing about...
;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: flexbody
To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 12:22 AM
Subject: [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
Bernard,
Is it possible that you respect Jims wishes and stop this non photographic
topic?
It has been asked several times before.
Please check this thread and do not post these posts for the second time.
Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernard Ferster
To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 11:54 PM
Subject: [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
At 01:36 AM 5/6/2008, you wrote:
At 02:21 AM 5/6/2008, JAMES WILLIAMS wrote:
The sagging of the US dollar is more political than economical, the
US government likes our dollar worth less because then other countries will buy
our goods. They are more concerned with making companies more money( you know
the trickle down effect, lol). Hope I did not push anyones buttons, but
sometime the truth hurts lol. But the real question is what is the truth? lol
That is hardly "truth": it is wild lunacy. The US government does not
control the value of the dollar in international trade; that is set by the
free market.
Not entirely so. The Administration has let the market to do it's worst,
but there was much it could have done to bolster the value of the dollar. Like
better control of interest rates, paying for the expenses of Mr. Bush's war by
increasing taxes instead of resorting to borrowing, slowing down import of oil,
and other devices best explained by an economist.
The dollar has recently fallen for a number of reasons. One primary
cause is the insistence of the oil market to continue to peg the price of crude
oil in US dollars: as the Chinese demand for oil has gone up, this has
pressured the dollar to decline in value relative to the Chinese Yuan and,
then, to the British Pound and to the Euro. There are other causes, but they
are of a like nature. The feeding frenzy of our government (Republican and
Democrat Parties alike) has not helped, nor have the costs of the Wars in
South-East Asia.
You have the basic idea. But each of the items you mentioned, with the
exception, perhaps, of Chinese behavior, is subject to influence by
Administration practices. (Oh yes, the Bushies among us will share the blame
with the Congress, forgetting that the veto power is in the White House. A
fuller explanation is available, off line, to Subjects of the Queen, and folk
from Parliamentary nations.)
In the short run, the cheap dollar will benefit the US. Our goods will
cost less overseas and we will have to pay more for imports. That will help to
adjust the balance of trade problem we have had since the days of Lyndon
Johnson. In the long run, the dollar will rebound.
John Maynard Keynes said, with irrefutable accuracy, that "In the long
run we are all dead." In the short run, foreigners touring the US are finding
great bargains.
Those of our members who point out that the world has far more pressing
problems that the success of H are quite correct and to be honored for their
humanity. Alas, we can not even keep a small camera company alive - how ever do
we control genocide, aggressive war and greedy gas gobbling SUV owners.
...........................B.F..........................
- References:
- [HUG ] The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: JAMES WILLIAMS
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Marc James Small
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Bernard Ferster
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs. digipics
- » [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- [HUG ] The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: JAMES WILLIAMS
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Marc James Small
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Bernard Ferster
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: The falling dollar/ photos vs digipics
- From: Q.G. de Bakker