[HUG] THE SWC - IS IT A CLICK... OR A CLACK...?

I would say a click.  

I pulled out my Arch Body Rodenstock 45 mm 4,5 to compare; that is a clack, 
suprisingly enough, - more noisier.  

The Rodenstock?  It draws a cristal clear and high contrast environment, very 
much in the league of the Biogon.  It's a pitty I get to use it so little.  
Every time I rig up the Arch body, tripod and ND filer and all, 'the telephone 
rings', or some uninvited guest arrives at my house.  Looking somewhat 
bewildered at the craw nest looking Arch Body, with filter holder and all.  
Stating rediculous utterings like; 'why don't you rather use one of these shiny 
small digital ones..?'

...a clack...

Tom of Oslo

> From: Eric Maquiling [emaquiling@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 2008-01-27 22:29:12 CET
> To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [HUG] Re: SV: Re: SV: Re: THE SWC
> 
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:16:41PM +0100, flexbody wrote:
> > A clack is something different.
> > A "clack" is what Belgians say when the mean "cap"
> 
> I have an Agfa  "Click" and a "Clack".  They ain't no Hasselblads though.  
> -- 
> Eric
> 
> =============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you 
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>

Other related posts: