[HUG ] Re: Shutter (2008)

Quoting JOANNE SIMPSON, who wrote on Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:23:04PM -0000 ..
> yeees. different elements for each roll - only the 2xISO3200 were fogged, 
> and only the SFX 200 had crescent-moons, but all 3 rolls had dust, and 2/3 
> had developer drips and water-stains. I could have let the fogging go as 
> X-ray damage on sensitive film, but the lab clearly had no interest in 
> accepting responsibility for things that were unquestionably post-exposure. 
> It is only the good nature and extreme embarrassment of the camera shop 
> that outsourced the processing preventing me from naming and shaming.
> At least they didn't charge me, and Stonehenge, Bath and Highgate Cemetery 
> are are re-takeable (at a cost).
> 6 years of shooting MF and at least 20 of film and this is the first time I 

3200ASA?  Sounds like Delta3200 to me.  Perfectly DIY processable in my
experience.  All the mistakes will be yours, all the dust will be yours.

But the satisfaction of a dust-free, well developed film will also be yours.

Nothing fancy is needed for B&W.  My shower doubles as my darkroom, I use a
bunch of old Patterson tanks which these days cost you (used) EUR 4 a pop on
camera shows.  I tend to buy them wherever I see them, they don't "eat
bread" as we say around here.  And they might become rare indeed.

Wilko

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: