[HUG ] SWC or 40mm?
- From: Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: HUG <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:11:19 +0100
Hello,I wonder if there is a difference in the performance between the swc and the 40mm? I guess the 38 should be better because it is a symmetrical design were the 40mm is retrofocus. But the swc is more expensive. Is the extra cost justified by the better performance, if there is any?
Best regards, Michiel Fokkema ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm?
- From: b . ferster
- [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm?
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm?
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] SWC or 40mm? - Michiel Fokkema
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - b . ferster
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - flexbody
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - flexbody
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Michiel Fokkema
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Michiel Fokkema
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - flexbody
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Michiel Fokkema
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Q.G. de Bakker
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Michiel Fokkema
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Karl Wolz
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Bob Adler
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - flexbody
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - flexbody
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Q.G. de Bakker
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - flexbody
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Q.G. de Bakker
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - flexbody
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Justin Knotzke
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - BOB KISS
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Q.G. de Bakker
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - flexbody
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm? - Jim Brick