[HUG ] SV: Re: SWC or 40mm?
- From: Tom Just Olsen <tjols@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:56:44 +0100 (MET)
I would say, generally, that the difference between SWC and the 40 mm -
regardless of type, is the distortion. The 40 mm distorts more than the
Biogon, - which hardly distorts at all. If you want a lens that draws
absolutely streight lines, - like photographing architecture, there is no way
around the SWC.
Tom of Oslo
> From: Karl Wolz [wolzphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 2009-01-02 23:59:43 CET
> To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm?
>
> QG,
>
> Thank you for a reasonable answer to the question.
>
> Karl Wolz
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Q.G. de Bakker
> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 2:14 PM
> To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [HUG ] Re: SWC or 40mm?
>
> Michiel Fokkema wrote:
>
> > Are they optically very different?
>
> They are different, yes.
>
> The old, C version is a good lens.
> The CF version has slightly beter resolution in the center, but also
> slightly more distortion. Having floating elements, this version also does
> better when used close up.
> The CFE IF version again has slightly higher resolution (which, by the way,
> is wasted on digital sensors. They just do not see it), and considerably
> more distortion.
>
>
> The are only two versions of the Biogon: the one on all SW(...) cameras from
>
> 1954 upto and including the 903 SWC, and the one on the 905 SWC.
> The difference between these two versions is minimal, the first version
> being very slightly better.
>
>
> Comparing the 40 mm to the Biogon, the Biogon 'wins'. But not by much.
> Distortion is very low (for a lens with such a wide angle of view) in the
> Biogon's images, and none of the 40 mm versions even comes close.
> But resolution and contrast of the 38 mm is not much different, certainly
> not when the lenses are stopped down a bit. The Biogon appears to hold up
> performance slightly better going out of the center towards the edges and
> corners of the image.
>
> The difference however i not that big, i think, to be a decision maker or
> breaker. Other considerations - like being able to use the lens on a reflex
> camera and inspect focus visually - may be more important to you.
>
>
> ============================================================================
> =================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
>
> =============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
Other related posts: