[HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost plus questions on flash systems.
- From: Sherman Bloom <shermanbloom@xxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:28:56 -0600
First paragraph of this Todaroff message is exactly what two
accountants have told me, and it is this approach which i use for my
personal tax reports. One year I took no deductions because I did
not sell, or try to sell, anything. Legally, I am told, it is the
EFFORT (which confirms INTENT) to sell that makes your deductions
legitimate. So I keep records of gallery exhibitions or other
evidence of bringing my work to public attention. Publication of
magazine articles and images is, I think, a good step in this
direction. Submissions to contests (which I find unpleasant) are also
good in this regard, especially if you win something and/or have your
images published or displayed.
Of course it is important keep records in a way that documents these
activities as well as your sales and expenses.
*REGARDING HASSELBLADS.*
I use a 503CW with a CFV or film back (as well as a Nikon system) .
I do a certain amount of desktop flower and macro photography and
some other still-life things. I use available light, sometimes with
balanced fluorescent lights added. I am reluctant to get involve
with flash systems, but maybe that would be a good thing. If I did
go with flash I would probably need a ring light capable of low-power
operation and, perhaps, one or more (low-power) slave units. Any
comments? There are some excellent systems available for the Nikon,
but right now I'm thinking only of the Hassy.
I also have a 500 ELX, but have never learned to use it, and so far
do not see the need. Am I missing something here?
Sherman Bloom
shermanbloom@xxxxxxx
www.digitalrailroad.net/shermanbloom
On Oct 15, 2008, at 8:55 PM, Gary Todoroff wrote:
You are in business in the US if you engage in financial activity
with the intent to make a profit. The same rules apply whether you
are a multi-million dollar company or an individual who loses money
most of the time. The IRS "guidelines" stipulate that you should
show a profit for some years, but I don't know what is the exact
number of years. Tax LAW, last I heard, did not specify that you
had to always make a profit, although numerous years of losses
could trigger an IRS audit. In any case, the tax laws were made for
the big guys, but the little guys get to play by the same rules.
There is absolutely nothing shady about taking whatever deductions
you are entitled to by the rules, as long as you are not fraudulent
in your declaration of income and expense. That is the difference
between tax AVOIDANCE and tax EVASION.
What I really hate is the smug attitude of someone who has always
collected a paycheck who says to the businessman, "Can't you just
write it off?" That is money out of your pocket, no matter what the
expense. A write-off is money spent, plain and simple. If you can
justify it as a business expense, however, some or all of it can be
deducted from the profit of your business on which taxes are paid.
An expense as large as the stratospheric cost of a Hassleblad these
days would probably need to be put on a deduction schedule, in
which you can only show a portion of the overall expense over a few
years. In these digital days, you may not be able to actually
deduct all the equipment expense from your profit until long after
the equipment is obsolete.
In any case, I'm neither a lawyer nor an accountant. All the money
I give those gusy to keep up with the insane rules, however, is a
business tax "write-off", and an absurd waste of money that I would
much rather keep in my pocket!! If you are not filing an IRS
Schedule C these days showing profit and loss for some kind of
business, then just kiss your paycheck money goodbye as it takes
wings toward the bottomless pit called Washington, D.C.
Gary Todoroff
In the USA, You must be trying to run a business.... with verifiable
"things" that you do to maintain a business.... Then and only
then can you
deduct your costs.... and yes, from your other income if it is a
loss.
Buying a $75K Hasselblad or Leica S2 system, taking it off the
taxes and
then doing absolutely nothing to actually run a business ( real
advertising, some jobs, maybe a few customer meetings) will get your
deduction dumped if you get audited.
The trick it to run the business at a zero, or, better yet, $1
profit a
year.... and then run it forever...... Then you can buy a $75
Blad system
and they can not complain...... as long as you can show you used the
equipment in earning the revenue.......
I think our Tax guys are more intolerant.........than the
Canadians......
Frank Filippone
red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
======================================================================
=======================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when
you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [HUG ] A Sad Day
- From: Bob Adler
- [HUG ] Re: A Sad Day
- From: Jack Maddox
- [HUG ] On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Sue Pearce
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Richard Schiff
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Richard Schiff
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Richard Schiff
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Tom Just Olsen
- [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Gary Todoroff
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost plus questions on flash systems.
- » [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost plus questions on flash systems.
- » [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost plus questions on flash systems. - joe mcguckin
What I really hate is the smug attitude of someone who has always collected a paycheck who says to the businessman, "Can't you just write it off?" That is money out of your pocket, no matter what the expense. A write-off is money spent, plain and simple. If you can justify it as a business expense, however, some or all of it can be deducted from the profit of your business on which taxes are paid. An expense as large as the stratospheric cost of a Hassleblad these days would probably need to be put on a deduction schedule, in which you can only show a portion of the overall expense over a few years. In these digital days, you may not be able to actually deduct all the equipment expense from your profit until long after the equipment is obsolete.
In any case, I'm neither a lawyer nor an accountant. All the money I give those gusy to keep up with the insane rules, however, is a business tax "write-off", and an absurd waste of money that I would much rather keep in my pocket!! If you are not filing an IRS Schedule C these days showing profit and loss for some kind of business, then just kiss your paycheck money goodbye as it takes wings toward the bottomless pit called Washington, D.C.
Gary Todoroff
In the USA, You must be trying to run a business.... with verifiable"things" that you do to maintain a business.... Then and only then can you deduct your costs.... and yes, from your other income if it is a loss.Buying a $75K Hasselblad or Leica S2 system, taking it off the taxes andthen doing absolutely nothing to actually run a business ( real advertising, some jobs, maybe a few customer meetings) will get your deduction dumped if you get audited.The trick it to run the business at a zero, or, better yet, $1 profit a year.... and then run it forever...... Then you can buy a $75 Blad systemand they can not complain...... as long as you can show you used the equipment in earning the revenue.......I think our Tax guys are more intolerant.........than the Canadians......Frank Filippone red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
====================================================================== ======================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [HUG ] A Sad Day
- From: Bob Adler
- [HUG ] Re: A Sad Day
- From: Jack Maddox
- [HUG ] On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Sue Pearce
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Richard Schiff
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Richard Schiff
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Richard Schiff
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Tom Just Olsen
- [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: On the subject of equipement cost
- From: Gary Todoroff