[HUG] Re: Optical performance of Hasselblad 60-120mm FE Handheld
- From: Evan J Dong <ejdong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:50:45 -0400
Per,
I'm looking forward to your answers. I look on the internet for the PDF
of the Contax 45-90mm, Pentax 45-85mm, and the Rollei 60140mm zoom
lenses. Guess that all would be somewhat similar to each other.
Thanks and have a good weekend.
Evan
Per Nordlund wrote:
Hi Evan,
you'll have to wait at least until Tuesday before I can check all
those filter/shade questions.
Why the 60-120 wasn't made for 500 cameras? Lots of reasons, like the
CF shutter having too small diameter, and all mechanical complications
you can dream of. (Imagine getting the aperture and shutter speed
setting rings through the cam rings necessary in a zoom lens, or a
shutter key-shaft that can handle the long movement of the shutter unit.)
The performance of the 60-120 is high, as you say. I won't comment on
lenses for other brands, that would just sound biased. But I'm quite
sure you can find datasheet for the Contax lens, and probably the
Rollei lens, on internet.
Best regards,
Per Nordlund
Optical Design\Hasselblad
-----hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----
To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Evan J Dong <ejdong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 10/26/2007 04:37PM
Subject: [HUG] Optical performance of Hasselblad 60-120mm FE Handheld
Per,
I bought a 60120m FE courtesy of Jim Brick's advice. In the
process, I
scrounge around for a lens hood , the Polarizer filter, and Polarizer
Filter ring. It took awhile and I should be receiving the items
shortly.
If the lens hood is NOT the correct 60-120mm, but the deeper one made
for the 350mm FE lens, would this created any problem for me in
use of
any of the 93mm filters? Especially for the 93mm Polarizer, would
there
be vignetting at the corners of my image? I do not have the lens hood
yet, but if it creates problems, I will return it and search out a
60-120mm lens hood.
Could I use a SW 86mm polarizer filter on this lens and would
there be
any problems with a smaller filter?
I been shooting with this lens hand held and its quite heavy, but
sharp
and contrast y. Its a wonder that this lens was never made or the the
idea suggested for the 500 series version. Being that it is a of a
modern design and has the latest multi coating, how does this lens
compare to the Contax 645 45-90mm zoom, the Rollei 60-140mm, and the
Pentax 45-85mm? The mentioned zooms are all of recent manufacture
and
are of modern design.
Evan
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon
to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up
when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
==========================================================================================================To
unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [HUG] PME-3 and 51
- From: Henk Westerhof
- [HUG] Re: PME-3 and 51
- From: Per Nordlund
- [HUG] Optical performance of Hasselblad 60-120mm FE Handheld
- From: Evan J Dong
- [HUG] Re: Optical performance of Hasselblad 60-120mm FE Handheld
- From: Per Nordlund
Other related posts:
- » [HUG] Optical performance of Hasselblad 60-120mm FE Handheld
- » [HUG] Re: Optical performance of Hasselblad 60-120mm FE Handheld
- » [HUG] Re: Optical performance of Hasselblad 60-120mm FE Handheld
Hi Evan,you'll have to wait at least until Tuesday before I can check all those filter/shade questions. Why the 60-120 wasn't made for 500 cameras? Lots of reasons, like the CF shutter having too small diameter, and all mechanical complications you can dream of. (Imagine getting the aperture and shutter speed setting rings through the cam rings necessary in a zoom lens, or a shutter key-shaft that can handle the long movement of the shutter unit.) The performance of the 60-120 is high, as you say. I won't comment on lenses for other brands, that would just sound biased. But I'm quite sure you can find datasheet for the Contax lens, and probably the Rollei lens, on internet. Best regards, Per Nordlund
Optical Design\Hasselblad
-----hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----
To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Evan J Dong <ejdong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 10/26/2007 04:37PM
Subject: [HUG] Optical performance of Hasselblad 60-120mm FE Handheld
Per,
I bought a 60120m FE courtesy of Jim Brick's advice. In the
process, I
scrounge around for a lens hood , the Polarizer filter, and Polarizer
Filter ring. It took awhile and I should be receiving the items
shortly.
If the lens hood is NOT the correct 60-120mm, but the deeper one made
for the 350mm FE lens, would this created any problem for me in
use of
any of the 93mm filters? Especially for the 93mm Polarizer, would
there
be vignetting at the corners of my image? I do not have the lens hood
yet, but if it creates problems, I will return it and search out a
60-120mm lens hood.
Could I use a SW 86mm polarizer filter on this lens and would
there be
any problems with a smaller filter?
I been shooting with this lens hand held and its quite heavy, but
sharp
and contrast y. Its a wonder that this lens was never made or the the
idea suggested for the 500 series version. Being that it is a of a
modern design and has the latest multi coating, how does this lens
compare to the Contax 645 45-90mm zoom, the Rollei 60-140mm, and the
Pentax 45-85mm? The mentioned zooms are all of recent manufacture
and
are of modern design.
Evan
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon
to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up
when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
==========================================================================================================To
unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [HUG] PME-3 and 51
- From: Henk Westerhof
- [HUG] Re: PME-3 and 51
- From: Per Nordlund
- [HUG] Optical performance of Hasselblad 60-120mm FE Handheld
- From: Evan J Dong
- [HUG] Re: Optical performance of Hasselblad 60-120mm FE Handheld
- From: Per Nordlund