[HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: "Henk Westerhof" <Henk.Westerhof@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:38:19 +0200
Yip, you can switch between panorama (65mm) and regular (36mm) at any time; the
camera will transport the film accordingly back and forth.
I'm very curious about your experiences with the rented Xpan...
________________________________
Van: hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx namens Justin F. Knotzke
Verzonden: za 27-10-2007 0:31
Aan: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Onderwerp: [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
On 26/10/2007, Nick Wilson <toona@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, I understand the situation. I mentioned it as Justin is considering
a purchase and Henk mentioned the Fuji-badged version... the distributor
in Canada may not touch the (identical) TX versions.
I further added that this seems no longer 'necessary' for a system that
is no longer in production. In fact, Hasselblad seem to be cutting off
their nose to spite their face in not selling parts for the few TX
versions that trickle outside Japan. They would get the money for the
parts inventory earlier, rather than later.
Well the point might be moot as I don't think I will even find a Fuji
version here in Canada.. But if Hasselblad refused to touch them, I'm not
interested.
I am going to keep my eye open for an XPan. First I will rent one.
Correct me if I am wrong, but it's possible to shoot just regular 35mm with
this camera too no ?
J
--
Justin F. Knotzke
jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.shampoo.ca
- References:
- [HUG] Looking XPan Users
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Henk Westerhof
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Henk Westerhof
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Henk Westerhof
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Nick Wilson
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: flexbody
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Nick Wilson
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
Other related posts:
- » [HUG] Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- » [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- [HUG] Looking XPan Users
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Henk Westerhof
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Henk Westerhof
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Henk Westerhof
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Nick Wilson
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: flexbody
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Nick Wilson
- [HUG] Re: Looking XPan Users
- From: Justin F. Knotzke