[HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych
- From: "Franc Flipsen" <fujifan@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:32:30 -0600
Hi,I think the point he is trying to make is that when you scan or capture if you save it in Raw you get what the sensor saw at the time and if you save it to a tiff, dng or some other format you discard some of the data. tiff is a lossless format when opened but some of the data (not needed by the tiff file format)is stipped off the file before it is saved so the tiff file does not contain all the data the sensor saw but a raw file does contain all the data the sensor saw and nothing else, not even a color space profile.
Franc----- Original Message ----- From: "Austin Franklin" <austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:05 PM Subject: [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych
Hi Mark,A raw file is s digital negative A tiff or Photoshop psd file is a contact print made from that negative. its darned good; but its not all there.For a TIFF, I can't speak for a PSD file, there can be absolutely no loss at all. It can be absolutely %100 equal to "raw". It depends on what is doneto the TIFF file. If setpoints and tonal curves (or Bayer pattern reconciliation) are done, then what you say is true. But, there is norequirement for a TIFF file to have that set. The Leafscan scans it's "raw"scans (no setpoints and no tonal curves) to TIFF files. Also, all raw files are not the same. The raw file typically does have *some* level of processing done, at the very least the PRNU, and even more so, the white balance (setpoints) and possibly some other processing. So, "raw" may not be as raw as you would like. But, having the camera do somelevel of processing isn't a bad thing, necessarily. Each sensor system canbe characterized, and that characterization applied to the data to calibrate/normalize it. It's like having a "profile", like an ICC profile for printing, or calibrating your capture/development/printing for film. Everything is relative, and needs to have some level of calibration to be effective.Don't listen to me...Sometimes I do, sometimes I don't ;-)google it yourselfI don't need to "Google" it. I know how image capture is done, since I've designed quite a few digital cameras and scanners. And you know that. Regards, Austin =============================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych
- From: Austin Franklin
- [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych
- References:
- [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych
- From: Austin Franklin
- [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] IMG: Triptych - Bob Adler
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Richard Schiff
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Bob Adler
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Richard Schiff
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Franc Flipsen
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Bob Adler
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Richard Schiff
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Bob Adler
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Stefano Kovacs
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Bob Adler
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Stefano Kovacs
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Richard Schiff
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Richard Schiff
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Karl Wolz
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Franc Flipsen
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Bob Adler
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Franc Flipsen
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Bob Adler
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Richard Schiff
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Jim Brick
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Jim Brick
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Franc Flipsen
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Stefano Kovacs
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Bob Adler
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Q.G. de Bakker
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Richard Schiff
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Richard Schiff
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Roger Beamon
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Austin Franklin
- » [HUG ] Re: IMG: Triptych - Mark Rabiner