[HUG ] Re: Hasselblad, Leica, Rollei, Microtek [2/27/09]

OK nevermind.

Jim is a nice name too!

What was the middle part?


Mark William Rabiner



> From: Bob Adler <rgacpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:57:05 -0800 (PST)
> To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [HUG ] Re: Hasselblad, Leica, Rollei, Microtek [2/27/09]
> 
> Mark,
> I think it was Jim Williams who wrote that question, not Evan...
> Bob
>  Bob Adler
> Palo Alto, CA
> http://www.raflexions.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2009 1:06:54 PM
> Subject: [HUG ] Re: Hasselblad, Leica, Rollei, Microtek [2/27/09]
> 
> I find the idea that the stack of 5x7's I carry around with me in my camera
> bag not photographs quite comical. Some are from negs some are from digital
> cameras its hard for me sometimes to remember.
> The ideas that all the photographers now are out there NOT doing
> photography....
> Quite comical.
> What are they doing?
> Some cheap cop out I guess which does not fit the camera swappers criteria
> of "real photography".
> Lets see your pictures Evan!. I'm sure the integrity of which will send me
> and all my professional photographer friends back under the rocks from which
> we came.
> 
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> 
> 
> 
>> From: <jmswllms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reply-To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:34:51 -0800
>> To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [HUG ] Re: Hasselblad, Leica, Rollei, Microtek [2/27/09]
>> 
>> Just curious, do you think that shooting digital should be considered
>> photography since the the image is stored digitally? Are the pictures
>> photographs or some other term since they are printed? Don't mean to ruffle
>> feathers just curious, it has me confused. I'm old school lol
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: 3/3/09 12:01 PM
>> Subject: [HUG ] Re: Hasselblad, Leica, Rollei, Microtek [2/27/09]
>> 
>> One benefit if shooting FF digital or cropped DSLR digital even is it makes
>> it possible to be a commercial photographer or a photojournalist.  Something
>> other than a fine art photographer.
>> It puts you into the ball game.
>> 
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Evan J Dong <ejdong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reply-To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:35:08 -0500
>>> To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: [HUG ] Re: Hasselblad, Leica, Rollei, Microtek [2/27/09]
>>> 
>>> I guess that my question would be a stupid one of nature. Beside the
>>> fact of the FF digital SLR from Canon, Nikon, and Sony (in order of best
>>> to passable), what is the exactly benefits of going this route?
>>> Especially taken into consideration of the higher level of
>>> Post-Production work required for all digital files. There appears to be
>>> a distinct methodology within the digital workflow to make their digital
>>> files as close as possible in looking like Film Files having the greater
>>> 3-D look and dynamic range.
>>> 
>>> Granted that both system, Film based and digital ready files are not
>>> perfect, there appears to be a many software and program out there to
>>> help the digital files achieve that Film Look. Am I wrong here?
>>> 
>>> For those individual still using  film based system and having their
>>> images scanned, what is your digital workflow here?
>>> 
>>> For those in the digital SLR system, what is your digital workflow
>>> Post-Production and Why the need for it?
>>> 
>>> Evan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bob Adler wrote:
>>>> Unfortunately not everyone has the where-with-all to do this. I went
>>>> to FF DSLR and had to sell all my Hassy gear to do it. I still have
>>>> deep pangs of remorse, but I've managed to convince myself (almost)
>>>> that it was a good move. I am somewhat consoled with having gotten
>>>> a 4x5 kit, so I can still shoot film.
>>>> Sometimes, though, that makes me miss my Hassy's more. I may buy a
>>>> small Rollei outfit yet...
>>>> Ambivalent in California,
>>>> Bob
>>>>   
>>>> Bob Adler
>>>> Palo Alto, CA
>>>> http://www.raflexions.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> *From:* Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> *To:* "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 3, 2009 12:05:50 AM
>>>> *Subject:* [HUG ] Re: Hasselblad, Leica, Rollei, Microtek [2/27/09]
>>>> 
>>>> As I get into full frame digital there are two reasons whey I've not sold
>>>> one bit of my Hassy system.
>>>> 1. No one would give me anything worthwhile for it money wise.
>>>> 2. It's mine. I don't like other people shooting with my cameras.
>>>> 3. And any day now some rogue company will come out with a prosumer priced
>>>> medium format back which will jack up the value and usability of the
>>>> system
>>>> again to where it was before the crash. I'll get one of those backs and
>>>> start in again. My newish 100 planar will be the front runner of glass I'm
>>>> likely to use.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> From: Tom Just Olsen <tjols@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:tjols@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>>>> Reply-To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:48:14 +0100 (MET)
>>>>> To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>>> Subject: [HUG ]  Hasselblad, Leica, Rollei, Microtek [2/27/09]
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jim,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have had the 1Ds III for a year now, - but I still have all my
>>>> Hasselblad
>>>>> gear.  From my old 500C/M bought in the early 70' to my 10 years old
>>>> 203FE,
>>>>> SWC and so on.  I have not the heart to sell it.  It is like
>>>> shooting your own
>>>>> hunting dog.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But mostly I use my 1Ds III which works fine.  I also have this M8 -
>>>> which is
>>>>> a story for itself.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tom of Oslo 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: Jim Brick [jim@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jim@xxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>> Sent: 2009-03-02 21:12:32 CET
>>>>>> To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Subject: [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: <FS> Hasselblad, Leica, Rollei, Microtek
>>>>>> [2/27/09]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No, I just sold my electronic Hasselblad stuff, and my digistuff is a
>>>>>> 1Ds Mark III.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 2, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Tom Just Olsen wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jim,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am just curious; have you sold all your Hasselblad gear?  Further;
>>>>>>> what digital SLR are you using?  The 5D or the 1Ds III?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tom of Oslo
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
> 
============================================================================>>>
>
> =
>>>>>> ================================
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org
>>>> <http://www.freelists.org/> and logon to your
>>>>>> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
>>>>>> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
> 
============================================================================>>>
>
> =
>>>> ================================
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
>>>> your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
>>>> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
=============================================================================>>
=
>> ===============================
>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
>> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
>> subscribed,)
>> and unsubscribe from there.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
=============================================================================>>
=
>> ==============================To unsubscribe from this list, go to
>> www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and
>> password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
> 
> 
> 
> ==============================================================================
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> and unsubscribe from there.
> 
> 



============================================================================================================To
 unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account 
(the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and 
unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: