[HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: fujifan@xxxxxxxxx
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:08:28 -0800
Hi All,
I would tend to disagree with Jean-Luc on 2 points about the V700. First the
lens and CCD are in the bottom part of the scanner, the top housing has the
lamp only. Secondly, you need to adjust the film holder for your individual
unit. Epson realized that the manufacturing tolerances are not close enough to
produce the sharpest scan so they made the film holders adustable and the
aftermarket holders have even more precise adjustment. I regularly scan MF
film 6x12 (ISO100)at 3200 dpi emulsion side down and print 12x24 inch prints. I
have found that at 3200 dpi I can see the film grain before I can see the
pixels from the scan.
Regards,
Franc
Quoting Jean-Luc Farines <jlfarines@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi all,
>
> I 'll give you here some of my experience with V700 that I use
> regularly now from 3.2006.
>
> It is a great cheap scanner, especially for MF. The only correction
> you have to make to produce top sharp scans is to put film holder
> adjusters to max height (3.5mm, symbolized by a+). This is because
> films must have their argentic side facing up (Sensors are on the top
> cover of the scanner) and films tend to naturally curle DOWN in this
> case.
>
> I made test by putting film face down, but you get in this case
> diffraction problems on fine details, because light goes through
> entire film thickness.
>
> V750 is maybe even better in details rendition because of a better
> scanning lens, but never had the chance to test it.
>
> Anyway, here is links to my blog pages showing an example of a hassy
> scan made with this scanner and the workflow I used.
>
> http://www.farines-photo.com/blog/?p=3
>
> http://www.farines-photo.com/portfolio/giant/index.html
>
>
>
> Le 5 févr. 08 à 23:40, Richard Sintchak a écrit :
>
> > I understand the results from those two scanners are quite good.
> > Though reviews suggest it's not a huge improvement over the 4990,
> > which is one I use. Email me privately and I'll be happy to show
> > you a scan done at 2400 dpi on a Rollei SL66 image shot with a 80
> > Planar lens that will blow your socks off. I can email you both a
> > JPEG screen size of the image scan and a 100% full res view of a
> > portion showing the sharpness and resolution. Can a Nikon 9000 do
> > better? Of course but for printing up to 20x20 or so the 4990 does
> > a darn good job for the price. And being one generation back from
> > the V700 and 750 they can be had for a song.
> >
> > Richard S.
> > San Francisco
> >
> >
> > On 2/5/08, Franc Flipsen <fujifan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Dr. Rob,
> >
> > I have a V700 and I am quite happy with it. the only comment I have
> > is that
> > you should buy the Better Scanning MF film holder, It's well worth
> > the money
> > and greatly improves the scan quality. www.betterscanning.com
> >
> > Regards,
> > Franc
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <clix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 4:52 PM
> > Subject: [HUG] Epson V700 vs V750
> >
> >
> > > Hi all.
> > >
> > > I want to scan my Hasselblad color negs while I'm waiting for the
> > price on
> > > a
> > > P25 digital back to continue to drop lower.
> > >
> > > I see Amazon is selling the Epson V700 flatbed scanner for $473,
> > and the
> > > V750 for $732, both with free shipping.
> > >
> > > Amazon users of the V700 seem to be quite happy with the V700, while
> > > Amazon
> > > users of the V750 seem to be quite unhappy with the V750.
> > >
> > > Anyone have any suggestions, experience or comments regarding this
> > > subject?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dr. Rob
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > ======================================================================
> > > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon
> > to your
> > > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> > > subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
> > >
> >
> >
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > ======================================================================
> > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
> > your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when
> > you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
> >
> >
>
>
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Richard Schiff
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Jean-Luc Farines
- References:
- [HUG] Re: Old/New HUG
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG] Re: Old/New HUG
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG] Epson V700 vs V750
- From: clix
- [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Jean-Luc Farines
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Richard Schiff
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Jean-Luc Farines
- [HUG] Re: Old/New HUG
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG] Re: Old/New HUG
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG] Epson V700 vs V750
- From: clix
- [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Jean-Luc Farines