[HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Jean-Luc Farines <jlfarines@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:23:29 +0100
Hi Evan, max size possible to scan with V700 is 6x6 at 3200 dpi in 48
bits. My advice is to go definitely with 48 bits because you get much
better results in shadows details (better D-Max).
Le 26 févr. 08 à 14:24, Evan J Dong a écrit :
Jean-Luc,
Is there a maximum size that the scanner would allow a 6 X 6 image
to be in size by inches and dpi without any loss of shadow detail
and the d-max range?
I looked around for an used Imacon scanner, but they are a rarity on
the used market and fetch a big hefty price.
Evan
Jean-Luc Farines wrote:
Hi all,
I 'll give you here some of my experience with V700 that I use
regularly now from 3.2006.
It is a great cheap scanner, especially for MF. The only correction
you have to make to produce top sharp scans is to put film holder
adjusters to max height (3.5mm, symbolized by a+). This is because
films must have their argentic side facing up (Sensors are on the
top cover of the scanner) and films tend to naturally curle DOWN in
this case.
I made test by putting film face down, but you get in this case
diffraction problems on fine details, because light goes through
entire film thickness.
V750 is maybe even better in details rendition because of a better
scanning lens, but never had the chance to test it.
Anyway, here is links to my blog pages showing an example of a
hassy scan made with this scanner and the workflow I used.
http://www.farines-photo.com/blog/?p=3
http://www.farines-photo.com/portfolio/giant/index.html
Le 5 févr. 08 à 23:40, Richard Sintchak a écrit :
I understand the results from those two scanners are quite good.
Though reviews suggest it's not a huge improvement over the 4990,
which is one I use. Email me privately and I'll be happy to show
you a scan done at 2400 dpi on a Rollei SL66 image shot with a 80
Planar lens that will blow your socks off. I can email you both a
JPEG screen size of the image scan and a 100% full res view of a
portion showing the sharpness and resolution. Can a Nikon 9000 do
better? Of course but for printing up to 20x20 or so the 4990
does a darn good job for the price. And being one generation back
from the V700 and 750 they can be had for a song.
Richard S.
San Francisco
On 2/5/08, *Franc Flipsen* <fujifan@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:fujifan@xxxxxxxxx
>> wrote:
Dr. Rob,
I have a V700 and I am quite happy with it. the only comment I
have is that
you should buy the Better Scanning MF film holder, It's well
worth the money
and greatly improves the scan quality. www.betterscanning.com
<http://www.betterscanning.com>
Regards,
Franc
----- Original Message -----
From: <clix@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:clix@xxxxxxxxxx>>
To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 4:52 PM
Subject: [HUG] Epson V700 vs V750
> Hi all.
>
> I want to scan my Hasselblad color negs while I'm waiting for
the price on
> a
> P25 digital back to continue to drop lower.
>
> I see Amazon is selling the Epson V700 flatbed scanner for
$473, and the
> V750 for $732, both with free shipping.
>
> Amazon users of the V700 seem to be quite happy with the V700,
while
> Amazon
> users of the V750 seem to be quite unhappy with the V750.
>
> Anyone have any suggestions, experience or comments regarding
this
> subject?
>
> Thanks,
> Dr. Rob
>
>
>
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
====================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org
<http://www.freelists.org> and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when
you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
====================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org
<http://www.freelists.org> and logon to your account (the same
e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and
unsubscribe from there.
============================================================================================================To
unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account
(the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and
unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Evan J Dong
- References:
- [HUG] Re: Old/New HUG
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG] Re: Old/New HUG
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG] Epson V700 vs V750
- From: clix
- [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Jean-Luc Farines
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Evan J Dong
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- » [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
Jean-Luc,Is there a maximum size that the scanner would allow a 6 X 6 image to be in size by inches and dpi without any loss of shadow detail and the d-max range?
I looked around for an used Imacon scanner, but they are a rarity on the used market and fetch a big hefty price.
Evan Jean-Luc Farines wrote:
Hi all,I 'll give you here some of my experience with V700 that I use regularly now from 3.2006.It is a great cheap scanner, especially for MF. The only correction you have to make to produce top sharp scans is to put film holder adjusters to max height (3.5mm, symbolized by a+). This is because films must have their argentic side facing up (Sensors are on the top cover of the scanner) and films tend to naturally curle DOWN in this case.I made test by putting film face down, but you get in this case diffraction problems on fine details, because light goes through entire film thickness.V750 is maybe even better in details rendition because of a better scanning lens, but never had the chance to test it.Anyway, here is links to my blog pages showing an example of a hassy scan made with this scanner and the workflow I used.http://www.farines-photo.com/blog/?p=3 http://www.farines-photo.com/portfolio/giant/index.html Le 5 févr. 08 à 23:40, Richard Sintchak a écrit :I understand the results from those two scanners are quite good. Though reviews suggest it's not a huge improvement over the 4990, which is one I use. Email me privately and I'll be happy to show you a scan done at 2400 dpi on a Rollei SL66 image shot with a 80 Planar lens that will blow your socks off. I can email you both a JPEG screen size of the image scan and a 100% full res view of a portion showing the sharpness and resolution. Can a Nikon 9000 do better? Of course but for printing up to 20x20 or so the 4990 does a darn good job for the price. And being one generation back from the V700 and 750 they can be had for a song.Richard S. San FranciscoOn 2/5/08, *Franc Flipsen* <fujifan@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:fujifan@xxxxxxxxx >> wrote:Dr. Rob, I have a V700 and I am quite happy with it. the only comment I have is that you should buy the Better Scanning MF film holder, It's well worth the money and greatly improves the scan quality. www.betterscanning.com <http://www.betterscanning.com> Regards, Franc ----- Original Message ----- From: <clix@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:clix@xxxxxxxxxx>> To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 4:52 PM Subject: [HUG] Epson V700 vs V750 > Hi all. > > I want to scan my Hasselblad color negs while I'm waiting for the price on > a > P25 digital back to continue to drop lower. > > I see Amazon is selling the Epson V700 flatbed scanner for $473, and the > V750 for $732, both with free shipping. > > Amazon users of the V700 seem to be quite happy with the V700, while > Amazon > users of the V750 seem to be quite unhappy with the V750. >> Anyone have any suggestions, experience or comments regarding this> subject? > > Thanks, > Dr. Rob > > >= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ====================================================================> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org <http://www.freelists.org> and logon to your> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. >= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ====================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org <http://www.freelists.org> and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Evan J Dong
- [HUG] Re: Old/New HUG
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG] Re: Old/New HUG
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG] Epson V700 vs V750
- From: clix
- [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Franc Flipsen
- [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Jean-Luc Farines
- [HUG ] Re: [HUG] Re: Epson V700 vs V750
- From: Evan J Dong